- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:23:31 +0000
- To: "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2018 10:23:57 UTC
Hi Jake, Sorry for the delay, been prepping & running training. The 320px comes from the Reflow SC, where often inputs need to be reduced in size to fit the width. Your portal is a good example, where the label and input reflow, and the inputs are fit to 100% of the container/viewport width. A cut down version of that would be ideal ☺ So the technique would be a sufficient one for HTML content with form inputs. -Alastair From: "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" < Alastair, the following is not clear yet: > 6. Using flexible text input form control (new) I think this was recognising that inputs can be an issue, as 320px is not huge for a text-box, so something that shows it can be limited to 100% wide, with a label that moves above it at smaller sizes. => Can be an issue (which issue exact?) as 320px is not huge for a text-box (where does the 320 in this case comes from?) so something that shows it can be limited to 100% wide(width: 100% in CSS… depending on parent container?) with a label that moves above it at smaller sizes (like here in my portal: https://a11yportal.com/good-bad/request.html ??? Still in draft by the way) Cheers!
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2018 10:23:57 UTC