- From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 08:39:27 -0400
- To: Denis Boudreau <denis.boudreau@deque.com>
- Cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <325A6FF4-C917-4144-BB3C-7B235FD9782B@yahoo.com>
I think it’s okay that you weren’t sarcastic. lol Your statement looks great (no sarcasm intended)! > On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:34 AM, Denis Boudreau <denis.boudreau@deque.com> wrote: > > Yep, I like it too. > > /Denis > > > Denis Boudreau, CPWA | Principal Accessibility Consultant & Training Lead | 514-730-9168 > Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good > Deque.com > > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:02 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: >> LGTM >> >> On 23/08/2018 11:53, Alastair Campbell wrote: >> > Hi Andrew, Michael, >> > >> > I was going to draft an email about superseding WCAG 1.0, I didn’t >> > manage to write down who I was writing it to, I’m assuming it is a >> > general “to whom it may concern” type thing? >> > >> > The Accessibility Guidelines Working Group is announcing that the 1^st >> > version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG1) will be >> > marked as “superseded” by the end of the year. >> > >> > Almost 20 years ago the first version of the Web Content Accessibility >> > Guidelines [1] were published, providing much needed guidance on how to >> > make the web a more accessible place. Almost 10 years ago WCAG 2.0 was >> > published, marking a significant update in the approach of the >> > guidelines and how designers and developers could use them. This year >> > WCAG 2.1 was published [2], adding new guidance in several areas. >> > >> > Some people may already have assumed that WCAG 1.0 was obsolete, but in >> > W3C terminology marking it as “superseded” means that a newer version >> > exists which the W3C recommends for new adoption. If you are currently >> > following WCAG 1.0 we recommend moving to WCAG 2.1, but conformance >> > statements for the superseded version will still be valid. >> > >> > If you have any concerns about WCAG 1.0 being superseded please get in >> > touch, either to the working group chairs (group-ag-chairs@w3.org >> > <mailto:group-ag-chairs@w3.org>) or for a publicly viewable comment the >> > working group (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>). >> > >> > 1] https://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/ >> > >> > 2] https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/06/wcag21-rec/ >> > >> > It was really hard not to be sarcastic… is that ok? >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > -Alastair >> > >> > -- >> > >> > www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com/> >> > tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653 >> > follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc >> > Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT >> > >> > Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 >> > >> >> -- >> Patrick H. Lauke >> >> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke >> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com >> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >>
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2018 12:39:55 UTC