- From: Aparna Pasi <aparna.pasi@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:06:35 +0530
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: Denis Boudreau <denis.boudreau@deque.com>, redux@splintered.co.uk, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPCkmSEtCUFs4DWHV3RZ3+21=jggTWF28NzkAryCiiuCo2pqoA@mail.gmail.com>
+1, in all our experience with WCAG 2.1 , non text color contrast is the most used SC.. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 6:30 PM John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote: > +1, and I'll add that contrary to the perspective of some, native tab > focus on a customized backgrounds should be failing as well when the > contrast is insufficient. > > http://john.foliot.ca/demos/focuscolor.html > > JF > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Denis Boudreau <denis.boudreau@deque.com> > wrote: > >> While that may be true Patrick, based on my own experience assessing >> websites, I would have guess that insufficient non-text color contrast >> would be the most frequent kind of 2.1 issue as well. This stuff has been >> everywhere for as long as I can remember. >> >> /Denis >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 08:29 Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd caution as well that there's likely still a high degree of >>> uncertainty around how to test, what actually counts as a pass/fail, >>> what something does/doesn't apply to. Something that will even out over >>> time, no doubt...but for many auditors, this is uncharted territory >>> until they get more familiar with spotting common patterns of failure >>> etc. >>> >>> P >>> >>> On 20/08/2018 12:01, Alastair Campbell wrote: >>> > Hi everyone, >>> > >>> > A little aneq-data-point, I asked on Twitter what people were finding >>> > came up most in WCAG 2.1 audits from the new criteria: >>> > >>> > https://twitter.com/alastc/status/1030455692853952512 >>> > >>> > Non-text contrast (on inputs / focus styles) came up the most for most >>> > people. On a per-instance basis that isn’t too surprising, search >>> boxes >>> > are often on every page. >>> > >>> > I’m not sure there is anything to conclude from this, but if we start >>> > seeing people act on that more often, perhaps it is moving the needle. >>> > >>> > Kind regards, >>> > >>> > -Alastair >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com/> >>> > tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653 >>> > follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc >>> > Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=13+Queen+Square,+Bristol+BS1+4NT&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> > >>> > Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Patrick H. Lauke >>> >>> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke >>> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com >>> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >>> >>> -- >> /Denis >> >> -- >> Denis Boudreau >> Principal SME & trainer >> Web accessibility, inclusive design and UX >> Deque Systems inc. >> 514-730-9168 >> >> Keep in touch: @dboudreau >> > > > > -- > *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist > > Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good > > deque.com > > -- Satya Jaya Aparna Pasi CPACC Professional | Team Accessibility Lead Deque Software aparna.pasi@deque.com | +91-7093400949 "Accessibility is a feature not an option"
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 10:37:12 UTC