- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:28:53 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I'd caution as well that there's likely still a high degree of uncertainty around how to test, what actually counts as a pass/fail, what something does/doesn't apply to. Something that will even out over time, no doubt...but for many auditors, this is uncharted territory until they get more familiar with spotting common patterns of failure etc. P On 20/08/2018 12:01, Alastair Campbell wrote: > Hi everyone, > > A little aneq-data-point, I asked on Twitter what people were finding > came up most in WCAG 2.1 audits from the new criteria: > > https://twitter.com/alastc/status/1030455692853952512 > > Non-text contrast (on inputs / focus styles) came up the most for most > people. On a per-instance basis that isn’t too surprising, search boxes > are often on every page. > > I’m not sure there is anything to conclude from this, but if we start > seeing people act on that more often, perhaps it is moving the needle. > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com/> > tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653 > follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc > Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT > > Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 > -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 20 August 2018 12:29:19 UTC