Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC

Here is what I am missing. We already have autocomplete in HTML. It is not
going away. It is an awesome feature of HTML. It does and will help us all.

What this SC is doing is trying to force authors to do something more than
already exists in the HTML - by making developers provide a value for each
and every form field on their pages to enable some version of a secondary
purpose name - above and beyond the accessible name.

** katie **

*Katie Haritos-Shea*
*Principal ICT Accessibility Architect *

*WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy,* *IAAP CPACC+WAS = *
*CPWA* <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertificants>

*Cell: **703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>** |* *ryladog@gmail.com
<ryladog@gmail.com>* *| **Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>*

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did,
but people will never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
wrote:

>
>    - I think there is an advantage to showing some progress (however
>    small), which prompts the conversation
>
>
>
> I agree Alistair, having autocomplete also benefits users who have
> difficulty entering text including those on mobile, users of speech who may
> not want to speak private information in public, and users who may not be
> able to recall all the details of zipcodes, etc.   So while it doesn’t
> fully address the issue it provides benefit to a wide range of users with
> different types of disabilities not just users with cognitive and learning
> disabilities.
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Alastair Campbell [mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:53 AM
> *To:* Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com; ryladog@gmail.com
> *Cc:* david100@sympatico.ca; josh@interaccess.ie; lisa.seeman@zoho.com;
> w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> *Subject:* RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC
>
>
>
> Well, the question is then whether we have something in, or pretty much
> nothing.
>
>
>
> I think there is an advantage to showing some progress (however small),
> which prompts the conversation
>
>
>
> As I mentioned in IRC on the last call: having this (AA) SC starts a new
> chapter in our accessibility training materials, we haven't had
> non-screenreader metadata previously.
>
>
>
> Cognitive has been all about Plain English and UCD so far, this gives us a
> chance to talk through the reasoning for personalisation and what should
> come in future.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Brooks.Newton
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> I’m with Katie on this point.
>
>
>
> Brooks
>
>
>
> *From:* Katie Haritos-Shea
>
>
>
> Yep, that is what I am saying. Put off these two SCs, redo SC to address
> the user need, and point to a spec designed to do just that, when that is
> ready-ish
>
>
>