Re: Re[2]: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px?

We had consensus on Target Size AAA from late November, and the comments were generally on the AA rather than the AAA, so the AAA went through.

Our choices, as I see it are:

  1.  to keep it at AAA as is
  2.  to keep it at AAA as is, with the “at risk” label
  3.  pull it out if people feel that there wasn’t consensus

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <josh@interaccess.ie>
Reply-To: Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 04:26
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re[2]: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px?
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 04:25

Could be just missed in the 'rumble' alright..

We can talk about this later on the call, thanks.

__
Joshue O Connor
Director / InterAccess.ie

------ Original Message ------
From: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>>
To: "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com<mailto:stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>>; "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Sent: 23/01/2018 08:45:32
Subject: Re: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px?

I have to admit I lost track of the AAA version of this one, but I had thought it would be 44px without exception. Was that deemed too difficult even at AAA?

-Alastair


From: "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com<mailto:stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>>
Date: Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 02:20
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px?
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Sunday, 21 January 2018 at 02:19

As the subject indicates, I’m just wondering if we are really keeping Target Size (Enhanced) going to CR? At the very least, it should be renamed since it is no longer an enhanced version of anything.

The CFC covered the options at AA, but we still have open issues at AAA and no consensus on their resolutions. Since much of the discussion there, and lack of resolution, was around the defensibility of 22 CSS pixels as a viable measure, and that is still used in the AAA version, I was assuming it was going to be dropped as well.

Personally, I’d be fine with keeping it so long as we change it to simply having an exception for being within a block of text (i.e. no 22 by 22 CSS pixel requirement).

Sorry to be the negative Nancy…

Steve Repsher
Twitter<https://twitter.com/steverep<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fsteverep&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cff368e771bc04a9e037e08d562436a5d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522964046074840&sdata=49Pc7CkOzID%2B69tKyZRk55PnLXtqnyZEB15RBZGPm04%3D&reserved=0>> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/steverepsherjr/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fsteverepsherjr%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cff368e771bc04a9e037e08d562436a5d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522964046074840&sdata=RVRnFPtaXXl%2F6GYlTvBD20G899CaTB9PWnXodwhD%2B0I%3D&reserved=0>> | GitHub<https://github.com/steverep<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsteverep&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cff368e771bc04a9e037e08d562436a5d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522964046074840&sdata=OaJciW%2BK2pDo%2FljZSyQ2IE8bFEcK3bt%2BR0LYVr8hCf8%3D&reserved=0>>