- From: Abma, J.D. (Jake) <Jake.Abma@ing.nl>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:20:41 +0000
- To: "'Repsher, Stephen J'" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <164b4a82be764d7aa0631a5e73c0661c@SU8000007192.ad.ing.net>
+1 Steve, nothing negative Nancy about it, just sharp as knife! Your proposal works for me too. "Personally, I'd be fine with keeping it so long as we change it to simply having an exception for being within a block of text (i.e. no 22 by 22 CSS pixel requirement)." From: Repsher, Stephen J [mailto:stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com] Sent: zondag 21 januari 2018 3:19 To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? As the subject indicates, I'm just wondering if we are really keeping Target Size (Enhanced) going to CR? At the very least, it should be renamed since it is no longer an enhanced version of anything. The CFC covered the options at AA, but we still have open issues at AAA and no consensus on their resolutions. Since much of the discussion there, and lack of resolution, was around the defensibility of 22 CSS pixels as a viable measure, and that is still used in the AAA version, I was assuming it was going to be dropped as well. Personally, I'd be fine with keeping it so long as we change it to simply having an exception for being within a block of text (i.e. no 22 by 22 CSS pixel requirement). Sorry to be the negative Nancy... Steve Repsher Twitter<https://twitter.com/steverep> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/steverepsherjr/> | GitHub<https://github.com/steverep> ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately. -----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 21 January 2018 16:21:31 UTC