- From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:41:30 -0800
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <OFE5C3A147.00B739AC-ON8825821A.00140BDB-8825821A.001445D5@notes.na.collabserv.c>
+1 Okay I am withdrawing my -1. Steve is correct that my concerns are strictly editorial. However, I do think a number of people have now commented on the difficulty of parsing the latest text, so I am very wishful that this text get tweaked. I am happy to be one of the ones working on it offline. Michael Gower IBM Accessibility Research 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Michael Gower/CanWest/IBM To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: 2018-01-18 08:21 AM Subject: Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus -1 Sorry, but the SC preliminary text is incomprehensible now. I tried taking a stab at correcting this, but I don't like my version. > Where receiving pointer hover or keyboard focus triggers additional content to become visible, and removing hover or focus causes the additional content to be hidden, the following are true: Perhaps if the additional content become the subject of the text? I don't understand why the accommodation was made for 650, since a tab panel's content is updated on activation, not on hover. What that comment may have exposed is that some things like tab items may be authored to include hover as well as selection as a means of updating the tabpanel. If that is the case, this SC needs to be revamped to clarify that it is the dependency on hover to expose information that needs to be addressed. Here's a revision that I think addresses both issues: > When additional content is revealed or hidden based solely on a trigger item receiving keyboard focus or pointer hover, the following are true: Michael Gower IBM Accessibility Research 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: 2018-01-17 04:09 PM Subject: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Call For Consensus — ends Friday January 19th at 7pm Boston time. The Working Group has discussed responses to the following issues: 650: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/650) 655: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/655) 695: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/695) 711: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/711) Response to Issue 650: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#650 Response to Issue 655: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#655 Response to Issue 695: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#695 Response to Issue 711: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#711 The changes to the SC are implemented in this pull request: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/739 The changed SC can be viewed here: http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/hover-focus-edits/guidelines/#content-on-hover-or-focus If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Friday, 19 January 2018 03:41:58 UTC