W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2018

RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast

From: Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:32:16 +0000
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <fbbec4a99f6640b9b6e0fcd4e93be623@XCH15-08-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
It’s hard to vote on this one.  The pull request is coming from the Understanding branch which seems to have complicated things and git is reporting many conflicts.  I expected the only change here to be the SC title, but instead the definition for “states” is gone along with the link and possibly other changes.


From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 9:37 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast
Importance: High

Call For Consensus — ends Friday January 19th at 9pm Boston time.

The Working Group has discussed responses to the following issues:
649: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/649)
616: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/616)
411: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/411)
282: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/282)
680: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/680)
686: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/686)

Response to Issue 649: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#649

Response to Issue 616: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#616

Response to Issue 411: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#411

Response to Issue 282: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#282

Response to Issue 680: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#680

Response to Issue 686: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#686

The changes to the SC are implemented in this pull request: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/742

The changed SC can be viewed here: http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/graphics-contrast/guidelines/index.html#non-text-contrast

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.


Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility


Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 04:32:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:22 UTC