Re: Target size proposal

David MacDonald wrote:
> I don't know?
Likely that you have two chances.. Bob Hope and no hope..
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
> *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
> /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
>
> /            Including those with disabilities/
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy 
> policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick 
> <akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>     And what do you suppose Appleā€™s response to that will be?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     AWK
>
>     Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
>     Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
>     Adobe
>
>     akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
>
>     http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
>     *From: *David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca
>     <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>>
>     *Date: *Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 14:44
>     *To: *Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com
>     <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>
>     *Cc: *"Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.nl
>     <mailto:Jake.Abma@ing.nl>>, Patrick Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk
>     <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>     <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
>
>
>     *Subject: *Re: Target size proposal
>
>     I could live with 48px one dimension and default on the other
>
>
>     Cheers,
>     David MacDonald
>
>     *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.*
>
>     Tel: 613.235.4902 <tel:%28613%29%20235-4902>
>
>     LinkedIn
>     <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidmacdonald100&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cfe179d93bd154046eb8c08d55de2abef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518150510076464&sdata=U1RlphG2EZt7cPv4kW4vAZdHCYXBxF0NvBBCnFgP0BE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     twitter.com/davidmacd
>     <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdavidmacd&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cfe179d93bd154046eb8c08d55de2abef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518150510076464&sdata=riElSRXqEeYPnBfCMKM9%2FZ4vh4VA%2Bz4vss4zn26TclE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     GitHub
>     <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDavidMacDonald&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cfe179d93bd154046eb8c08d55de2abef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518150510076464&sdata=Th4pWd26e%2BbDvZMhS7Ga4%2FJolHhmJZbMKzyAS9e%2BIME%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     www.Can-Adapt.com
>     <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.can-adapt.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cfe179d93bd154046eb8c08d55de2abef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518150510076464&sdata=1HChO457IM40%2FH3aM3w87PIbV%2FPa99b3CeSrrEcriY0%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
>
>     /            Including those with disabilities/
>
>     If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy
>     policy
>     <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidmacd.com%2Fdisclaimer.html&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cfe179d93bd154046eb8c08d55de2abef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518150510076464&sdata=v%2BbLcR9JfiEjJRzALa1J0uzhg2Vi1xZdWw65RfXeQ%2BQ%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick
>     <akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>         I notice on the Google material guidelines page that the text
>         links are 15px tall (I think that on a 96dpi monitor this
>         means 25 CSS px) and I also see this:
>
>         Density
>         When mouse and keyboard are the primary input methods, button
>         measurements can be slightly reduced to accommodate dense UIs.
>         (32dpi in height)
>
>         Also, in the size and padding section, the material guidelines
>         indicate that the button can be 36dp inside the 48dp target,
>         so leaving 6dp on each side.
>
>         Thanks,
>         AWK
>
>         Andrew Kirkpatrick
>         Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>         Adobe
>
>         akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
>         http://twitter.com/awkawk
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cfe179d93bd154046eb8c08d55de2abef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518150510076464&sdata=58XiYRxQb77%2BJBNam7GzS4YE9UDCddxxG9r1RQxw%2Bqw%3D&reserved=0>
>
>         On 1/17/18, 13:36, "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.nl
>         <mailto:Jake.Abma@ing.nl>> wrote:
>
>
>             Ha, this is even true for almost all of Google's
>         showpieces like
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=WXzEs%2B1eMO5ki1axf8USZxnyUO604qWy3316bwwbzlI%3D&reserved=0
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=WXzEs%2B1eMO5ki1axf8USZxnyUO604qWy3316bwwbzlI%3D&reserved=0> 
>         Material Design
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaterial.io%2Fguidelines%2Fcomponents%2Fbuttons.html&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=dVHkoabFrQ7rTtJKOBIPvS6p%2F37ztHgsdvcJJ%2BGxNLs%3D&reserved=0
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaterial.io%2Fguidelines%2Fcomponents%2Fbuttons.html&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=dVHkoabFrQ7rTtJKOBIPvS6p%2F37ztHgsdvcJJ%2BGxNLs%3D&reserved=0> 
>          and Polymer
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webcomponents.org%2Fsearch%2Fcalendar&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=Sgh5De%2FsVAeaQtEUJQqujz51r8F8AE7Glk7qk06A89Q%3D&reserved=0
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webcomponents.org%2Fsearch%2Fcalendar&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=Sgh5De%2FsVAeaQtEUJQqujz51r8F8AE7Glk7qk06A89Q%3D&reserved=0> 
>         to name a few where there are more targets NOT having the
>         desired size than the ones that do.
>
>
>             -----Original Message-----
>             From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk
>         <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>]
>             Sent: woensdag 17 januari 2018 19:23
>             To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>             Subject: Re: Target size proposal
>
>             On 17/01/2018 17:48, Abma, J.D. (Jake) wrote:
>         > After some research it's clear that Microsoft also has 48X48
>         now (7/9
>         > mm) and the 26/34 is pretty old for MS phones/apps in from
>         2010...
>         >
>         > But they also changed a lot and so pick a number (23, 26,
>         34, 40, 48
>         > and maybe more) and you're save... :-)
>         >
>         > So what research at which time by whom is the question as
>         but for sure
>         > the 26/34 is not what they use now (or maybe somewhere...)
>
>             Also worth pointing out (as already pointed out on various
>         occasions in the past) that whether you look at Microsoft,
>         Google, or Apple, guidance on target sizes is advisory -
>         usually couched in terms like "in general", "should", "avoid",
>         and so on - and that these companies themselves sometimes
>         break their own guidance when deemed appropriate (a classic
>         example with Apple, for instance, would be the minuscule "Back"
>             control in the phone's top bar when you, say, follow a
>         link in an email and it opens Safari). Meaning these are more
>         subtle than hard pass/fail values set in stone, and more of
>         good practice / UX guidance.
>
>             P
>             --
>             Patrick H. Lauke
>
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.splintered.co.uk&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=HA374LsQSiu%2FpVvbV5zYMxZ47RrtKyRodY3n%2BtH7Z08%3D&reserved=0
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.splintered.co.uk&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=HA374LsQSiu%2FpVvbV5zYMxZ47RrtKyRodY3n%2BtH7Z08%3D&reserved=0>
>         |
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpatrickhlauke&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=6p3BH235FZF%2BzXDnbpDobSAoMEB1%2BRZerQ5PzWY1wXg%3D&reserved=0
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpatrickhlauke&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=6p3BH235FZF%2BzXDnbpDobSAoMEB1%2BRZerQ5PzWY1wXg%3D&reserved=0>
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fredux%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=NBepmZOa7eJl7fySzPtLJYMHb7veEYL4Rol3Rqq4oNU%3D&reserved=0
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fredux%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=NBepmZOa7eJl7fySzPtLJYMHb7veEYL4Rol3Rqq4oNU%3D&reserved=0>
>         |
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fredux.deviantart.com&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=LzOWqbg5M6m%2F0kdcGjEoK41nV7OIEzOkUBPl41k48S4%3D&reserved=0
>         <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fredux.deviantart.com&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Ce2190970b0974728ab6f08d55dd92938%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636518109660779973&sdata=LzOWqbg5M6m%2F0kdcGjEoK41nV7OIEzOkUBPl41k48S4%3D&reserved=0>
>
>             twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>
>            
>         -----------------------------------------------------------------
>             ATTENTION:
>             The information in this e-mail is confidential and only
>         meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
>         recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the
>         sender know and delete the message immediately.
>            
>         -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 22:06:05 UTC