W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2018

Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:26:55 +0000
To: "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
CC: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1CD9E71B-886E-4054-A4FF-7A494F291335@nomensa.com>
Hi Steve,

>  I'd strongly suggest changing "can be disabled" to "a mechanism is available to disable", 

Arg, it’s been like that for like a year, and you bring that up now??!  ;-)

I would bring in the same argument from text-spacing, the idea is NOT to add a widget to the page, we’d like to encourage the use of the preference.

I’ll live with it to get it through, but I will personally email you every instance I find of people assuming it requires a widget!

> Second, please find a better word than "states" to use in the definition for motion animation

 Um, how about conditions? There aren’t that many suitable synonyms.


Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 09:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:21 UTC