Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific?

+1

glenda sims  |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773
*web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals

[image: IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals:
Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)]
<http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification>




On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday January 17th at 1:30am Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed responses to the following issue:
>
> 598: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/598)
>
>
>
> Response to Issue 598: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_
> Dec_WD_Issues#598
>
>
>
> The response is: “Thank you for the comment. We intend to include PDF
> documents in the implementations for review. PDF documents can satisfy the
> WCAG definition for "web page", which is: "a non-embedded resource obtained
> from a single URI using HTTP plus any other resources that are used in the
> rendering or intended to be rendered together with it by a user agent".
> This is the same reasoning used to include techniques for PDF for WCAG 2.0
> in the past, and we will be looking to offer PDF techniques for WCAG 2.1
> Success Criteria as well.”
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>