Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday January 16th at 11:59pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> This CFC is a proposal to add a definition for “Animation”:
>
>
>
> The changes to the SC are implemented in this pull request:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/727
>
>
>
> The new definition is:
>
> Animation:
>
> addition of steps between states to create the illusion of movement and/or
> to give a sense of movement.
>
> For example, an element which appears instantly in one frame is not using
> animation. An element which moves into place or changes size while
> appearing is considered to be animated.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>