RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2

I honestly can’t figure out what’s in the CFC either.

One link gives a 404.  The other points to github issues and the other to minutes discussing the item.

I appreciate all of the work that people have put in – but it’s not clear what the former and proposed language is and what we are agreeing or not agreeing to.


From: lisa.seeman []
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 10:46 AM
To: W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <>
Subject: Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2

please consider this email an objection
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<>, Twitter<>

---- On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:41:37 +0200 <<>> wrote ----

I have clicked on the links of this CFC. The minuets are hard to understand and the link to the pull request mearly takes me to the full specification and I can not tell what this CFC actually is about - IE - What is the original wording and what is the change.
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<>, Twitter<>

---- On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:17:44 +0200 Glenda Sims<<>> wrote ----

glenda sims  |   team a11y lead   |<>    |    512.963.3773
*web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals


On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <<>> wrote:
Call For Consensus — ends January 12 at 1:30pm Boston time.

The Working Group has discussed a change to add a description to the 2.6 Guideline. This was discussed on the call (

The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:  (see implemented at)

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.


Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility

Received on Sunday, 14 January 2018 23:54:35 UTC