Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4?

AWK:
> If I use HTML in a “living standard” way today and include all of the appropriate meanings/purposes that are defined, but then HTML adds meanings, how will I be able to handle my conformance? I haven’t changed the site, but the list changes. We can’t leave that open-ended.

As per Michael’s email on the other thread: Conformance is at a particular date, so it’s the standard at the time.

This was one of the reasons that the W3C has tried to ‘version’ HTML though, so your conformance could also reference a specific version, e.g:
https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/sec-forms.html#autofill-field


-Alastair