Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics

JF wrote:
> we cannot retroactively say that they are *REQUIRED*, nor can we fail content that does not use either form of landmark determination.

I agreed that In WCAG 2.0 we couldn’t add it, but why can’t we simple add a failure for that in 2.1?

It would be similar in concept to F91:
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/failures.html#F91


(I.e. lacking markup that the content implies visually, the point of 1.3.1.)

Why would we need a new (very-overlapping) SC for that?

Create the new failure doc, link to up from 1.3.1 material… job done?

-Alastair