Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644

I have an issue with making the easiest way to conform to WCAG using a plartform that does not support full conformence and without markup
Put me down as an objection
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:37:19 +0200 Jim Allan<jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote ---- 

+1


On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
   Call For Consensus — ends Thursday January 9th at 1:45pm Boston time.
  
 The Working Group has discussed a response to issue 656 (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/656) and issue 644 (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/644).
  
 The specific response is at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#656 and https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#644, and it was surveyed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/resolvingissues3/results#xq5. The implemented changes to the SC can be viewed here:  http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/issue644/guidelines/index.html#text-spacing  
  
 Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/01/09-ag-minutes.html#item02
  
 If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
  
 Thanks,
 AWK
  
 Andrew Kirkpatrick
 Group Product Manager, Accessibility
 Adobe 
  
 akirkpat@adobe.com
 https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0
  
  
 
 
 




-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator

Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964