Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520

I appolgise for being outside the deadline but I object to his CFC.




Can we have at least a minimum text label added to CFCs so that people can track what CFCs they have reviewed and identify which h are relavent. This is especially important for CFC s related to coga and CFCs are being passed in huge numbers , some about COGA,  without being sure if anyone from coga has been able to review them, and no agreement from COGA recorded.


Please add to the objection the following note: This CFC was passed with no input or review from COGA
 

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter




 ---- On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 05:15:55 +0200  akirkpat@adobe.com  wrote ----

      AGWG’ers,
  
 As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC and no responses indicating that group members could not live this this decision, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group. 
  
 This decision will be recorded at https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0
  
 Thanks,
 AWK
  
 Andrew Kirkpatrick
 Group Product Manager, Accessibility
 Adobe 
  
 akirkpat@adobe.com
 http://twitter.com/awkawk
  
  
  From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
 Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 16:57
 To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
 Subject: CFC - Response to Issue 520
 Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
 Resent-Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 16:55
 
   
 
 Call For Consensus — ends Thursday January 9th at 5pm Boston time.
  
 The Working Group has discussed a response to issue 520 (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/520).
  
 The specific response is at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#520, and it was surveyed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/resolvingissues3/results#xq2.
  
 The response was discussed on the call (minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/01/09-ag-minutes.html#item03) and with follow-up discussion on the list (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2018JanMar/0166.html).
  
 If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
  
 Thanks,
 AWK
  
 Andrew Kirkpatrick
 Group Product Manager, Accessibility
 Adobe 
  
 akirkpat@adobe.com
 http://twitter.com/awkawk