RE: Guideline 2.6 text

Steve,

I actually agree with you and prefer your suggestion.



On Jan 9, 2018 11:40 PM, "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>
wrote:

> I don’t think using words like “appropriate” provides much of a guideline,
> so I’m not a fan of either of these.  I think Andrew’s roughly captures the
> point, but I’d suggest going instead down a path similar to GL 2.3,
> Seizures, and stating what we know not to do.  Maybe something like:
>
>
>
> “Sensors: Do not use device sensors in ways that presume physical
> capabilities of the user.”
>
>
>
> Note I dropped “additional” and “input”.  Neither of these helps the
> handle at all.
>
>
>
> Katie, your version I think is not the right message.  That is, the
> guideline should not be to use sensors because there’s no accessibility
> reason for that.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> *From:* Katie Haritos-Shea [mailto:ryladog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 09, 2018 10:52 PM
> *To:* Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> *Cc:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Guideline 2.6 text
>
>
>
> Weak.
>
>
>
> Suggest: Guideline: Sensor Inputs
>
>
>
> Provide additional optional functionality using device sensors when
> appropriate
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2018 10:42 PM, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Thoughts on this?
>
> http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/2.6GL/guidelines/index.html#
> additional-sensor-inputs
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
>
>