From: Alastair Campbell [mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 5:00 AM I agree it would help to have something like ‘pop-over’ as the target of the SC. I’m fairly sure we did at one stage, Steve (CCed) might be able to remember why we dropped that? [Jason] The term was used (with disagreement about whether it should be “popup” or “popover”), but I don’t recall there being a definition. It was relatively uncontroversial, as I recall, that these terms did not have a generally accepted meaning that was clear or precise enough to meet our testability requirements. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2018 12:59:36 UTC