- From: Abma, J.D. (Jake) <Jake.Abma@ing.nl>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 13:26:57 +0000
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1515331617494.61150@ing.nl>
Agree with David about drawing a bright line and to clearly define the distinction. The "Dismissable" sentence is not achievable for ARIA tabs and also for the similar finger tabs concept. First thing I've tried was searching for the definition of "additional content" and couldn't find it. It puts the term in a grey area which makes assumptions unfounded. I see there's a definition for "supplemental content" which is "additional content that illustrates or clarifies the primary content". So if I put clarifying content for the primary content in a Tab structure with- or even without using ARIA, add it to a custom tooltip or using "finger tabs" which is very similar to ARIA tabs, that's a design choice based on the amount of information and aesthetics. As supplemental content is a subset of additional content you can't state: "A tab set switches content, it doesn’t show additional content." We "hide" supplemental/additional content in finger tabs to saved screen space and only load it when hovering or focus is on a finger tab. So it's not there on page load and you can't "dismiss" the finger tab content panel. The loading is also a developer choice, not a predetermined given. ________________________________ From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 12:07 PM To: Patrick H. Lauke Cc: WCAG Subject: Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? > That line could possibly be fixed with “...without *having to* move the pointer or keyboard focus” or words to that effect. Maybe I'm missing something... I don't know how that would fix it. The only way that I can see being able to close a popup without "moving the pointer" or "without having to move the pointer" is by pressing the "esc" key, in which case it seems we are saying that it can be dismissed without use of the pointer?? Cheers, David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc. Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd> GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/> Adapting the web to all users Including those with disabilities If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk<mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>> wrote: That line could possibly be fixed with “...without *having to* move the pointer or keyboard focus” or words to that effect. P On 7 Jan 2018, at 00:48, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote: [...] I do think the line "dismiss the additional content without moving pointer hover or keyboard focus" is weird, because the user has to move the pointer to hit the "x" ... how would a mouse user dismiss a popup without moving the mouse? ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately. -----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 7 January 2018 13:27:28 UTC