Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module

Can we revisit this now the holiday is over.

Can we have a standing consensus  to publish incremental working drafts of the Gap analysis/ road map and user research module. It will help us get all the information we have out as quickly as possible.  


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:18:52 +0200 Joshue O Connor<josh@interaccess.ie> wrote ---- 

Lisa, 


We'll have to wait until after the holidays. 


Thanks 


Josh 


InterAccess - Accessible UX


-------- Original message --------
From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> 
Date: 18/12/2017 23:17 (GMT+00:00) 
To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> 
Cc: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-apa <public-apa@w3.org> 
Subject: Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user  research module 



 I don't think we should attempt to get any consensus like that from the WGs until after the holidays at this point, and I did warn that the chairs might not be able to put it on the agenda before the holidays when we discussed this a couple weeks ago. Now too many people are away already and a standing publication consent, which is a big decision, shouldn't be snuck through in that situation. 
 
 Even if you convince the chairs and manage to obtain it, I do not support publishing before January when there can be sufficient review of the proposed draft. I encourage Lisa and Roy to work over the next couple weeks on preparing a draft that is ready for review, but Roy please do not publish it until after the task force (and I) can take a look in January. 
 
 While I suggested obtaining a standing consent to publish, I meant that to remove some bureaucracy, not to remove the task force from the process. A draft published over the holiday would only have editor input, not sufficient task force and WG input, and that is not sufficient review for publication even with a standing consent on the record.
 
 Michael
 
 
 On 18/12/2017 4:45 PM, lisa.seeman wrote:
 
   
 Hi Folks 
 
 The COGA Gap analysis and road map has been published with extremely out of date information. The user research module is also very out of data. Can we have the working groups consent to publish incremental working drafts of the Gap analysis/ road map and user research module without going though a CFC process each time from both working groups. That way Roy and me might be able to get the current draft updated over the holiday. 
  All the best
 
 Lisa Seeman
 
 LinkedIn, Twitter