w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2018 by date

Friday, 30 March 2018

• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark Chuck Adams
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark Alastair Campbell
• Re: 1.3.5 from Mark John Foliot
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark Alastair Campbell
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark Chuck Adams
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark Alastair Campbell
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark Chuck Adams
• Re: 1.3.5 from Mark Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• False alarm Re: Understanding survey Change of Content -> Status Changes Michael Cooper

Thursday, 29 March 2018

• 1.3.5 from Mark lisa.seeman
• Understanding survey Change of Content -> Status Changes Michael Cooper
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 Marc Johlic
• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 Chuck Adams
• Re: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• another test page for 1.3.5 lisa.seeman
• Re: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 Greg Lowney
• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 EA Draffan
• Re: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 Fredrik Larsson
• AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess

Tuesday, 27 March 2018

• Minutes 27 March 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Alastair Campbell
• RE: Anyone want to volunteer to evaluate dequeuniversity.com (public) for WCAG 2.1 AA? Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 EA Draffan
• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Abma, J.D. (Jake)

Monday, 26 March 2018

• Anyone want to volunteer to evaluate dequeuniversity.com (public) for WCAG 2.1 AA? Glenda Sims
• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Chuck Adams
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 Fredrik Larsson
• Agenda - 27th March 2018 Alastair Campbell

Wednesday, 21 March 2018

• [Extended deadline] Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis Ku, Jaeun

Tuesday, 20 March 2018

• Minutes: Face to Face 20 March 2018 Jim Allan
• ISSUE-52: 806 Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-51: 772 Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• Minutes: Face to Face 19 March 2018 Jim Allan

Monday, 19 March 2018

• RE: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Forcing session timeout Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Forcing session timeout Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Chakravarthula, Srinivasu
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? John Foliot

Sunday, 18 March 2018

• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Marc Johlic
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? Glenda Sims
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? Glenda Sims
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? Marc Johlic
• What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? David MacDonald

Saturday, 17 March 2018

• [reminder] Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis Ku, Jaeun

Friday, 16 March 2018

• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Ian Pouncey
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Léonie Watson
• Re: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Detlev Fischer

Thursday, 15 March 2018

• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 Glenda Sims
• Re: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) Denis Boudreau
• RE: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) Jonathan Avila
• Re: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) John Foliot
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Jonathan Avila
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Michael Gower
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Alastair Campbell
• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is John Foliot
• RE: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Denis Boudreau
• RE: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Denis Boudreau
• RE: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference Chuck Adams
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Katie Haritos-Shea
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 15 March 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Agenda for F2F Monday and Tuesday March 19-20 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Detlev Fischer
• Re: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Michael Gower
• RE: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Wilcock, Mark
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Jim Allan

Wednesday, 14 March 2018

• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC John Foliot
• Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC Alastair Campbell

Tuesday, 13 March 2018

• MINUTES Tuesday WCAG call March 13, 2018 Michael Gower
• Re: RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET Mike Elledge
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.

Sunday, 11 March 2018

• RE: Projector for CSUN Chuck Adams

Saturday, 10 March 2018

• RE: Projector for CSUN Chuck Adams

Friday, 9 March 2018

• Projector for CSUN Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET Alastair Campbell
• Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET Alastair Campbell
• Re: Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis Thomas Westin
• RE: Heading update on QuiickRef Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis White, Jason J
• RE: Placement of 1.3.4 White, Jason J
• Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis Ku, Jaeun
• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef David MacDonald
• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef John Foliot

Thursday, 8 March 2018

• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef Jim Allan
• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Heading update on QuiickRef Alastair Campbell
• Placement of 1.3.4 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET Alastair Campbell
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Call for Review: ACT Rules Format 1.0 Working Draft Shadi Abou-Zahra

Wednesday, 7 March 2018

• Re: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec Léonie Watson
• RE: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete Alastair Campbell
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! John Foliot
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! lisa.seeman
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET EA Draffan
• Re: Question about individual SC implementation evaluations Katie Haritos-Shea
• Question about individual SC implementation evaluations Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET Greg Lowney

Tuesday, 6 March 2018

• Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec Michael Cooper
• Re: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec Léonie Watson
• Minutes March 6 David MacDonald
• Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec Michael Cooper
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time change –first half of 2018 Michael Cooper
• Re: Cal for today? Agenda for Glenda Sims
• RE: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Cal for today? Agenda for Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Michael Gower
• Re: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference Bailey, Bruce
• Fwd: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Cal for today? Agenda for Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Fwd: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Jonathan Avila

Monday, 5 March 2018

• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Jonathan Avila
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH

Saturday, 3 March 2018

• Re: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN Wayne Dick
• RE: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH

Friday, 2 March 2018

• Re: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN Wayne Dick
• Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH

Thursday, 1 March 2018

• Minutes from March 1 2018 call Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Update on My Work Daman Wandke
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 1 March 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Jonathan Avila
• RE: SC 1.3.4 Another consideration? Michael Gower

Wednesday, 28 February 2018

• RE: SC 1.3.4 Another consideration? Alastair Campbell
• SC 1.3.4 Another consideration? Michael Gower
• RE: 2.2.6 Timeouts versus 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Agenda for Thursday March 1 teleconference - 12pm ET John Foliot
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! David MacDonald
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update John Foliot
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update White, Jason J
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update John Foliot
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Jonathan Avila
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Michael Gower
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Alastair Campbell
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! Chaals Nevile
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! John Foliot
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Agenda for Thursday March 1 teleconference - 12pm ET Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! Alastair Campbell
• RE: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! EA Draffan
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Chakravarthula, Srinivasu

Tuesday, 27 February 2018

• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update Alastair Campbell
• RE: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! James Nurthen
• Security of Autocomplete - Good News! John Foliot
• 2.2.6 Timeouts versus 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable Michael Gower
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Glenda Sims
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Marc Johlic
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG David MacDonald
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Alastair Campbell
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG White, Jason J
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Alastair Campbell
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Michael Gower
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG John Foliot
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Laura Carlson
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Mike Elledge
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Denis Boudreau
• Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG Michael Cooper

Monday, 26 February 2018

• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Michael Gower
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN Jonathan Avila
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference EA Draffan
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Jonathan Avila

Sunday, 25 February 2018

• Can't scribe 27th Abma, J.D. (Jake)

Saturday, 24 February 2018

• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Joshue O Connor
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Katie Haritos-Shea

Friday, 23 February 2018

• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 Marc Johlic
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Alastair Campbell
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 22 February 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra

Thursday, 22 February 2018

• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC John Foliot
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? John Foliot
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN John Foliot
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC John Foliot
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH
• Re: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN Alastair Campbell
• A lasting impact on the industry - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN Joshue O Connor - InterAccess

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? White, Jason J
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 Jim Allan
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 Jim Allan
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Katie Haritos-Shea
• SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? lisa.seeman
• RE: CFC - response to issue 758 Wilcock, Mark
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. John Foliot
• RE: CFC - Response to 756 Wilcock, Mark
• RE: CFC - response to issue 760 Wilcock, Mark
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Jonathan Avila
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Alastair Campbell
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN ALAN SMITH
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: CFC - response to issue 760 Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Response to 756 Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - response to issue 758 Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Alastair Campbell
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Katie Haritos-Shea

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 Laura Carlson
• WCAG WG Meeting Minutes February 20, 2018 Laura Carlson
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC David MacDonald
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC John Foliot
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading Michael Cooper
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading lisa.seeman
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC lisa.seeman
• CFC - Response to 756 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - response to issue 758 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to Issue 759 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Issue 761 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - response to issue 760 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Alastair Campbell
• CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC David MacDonald
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference Mike Elledge
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose John Foliot
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Alastair Campbell
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference Pietro Cirrincione
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC David MacDonald
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose David MacDonald
• Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference Andrew Kirkpatrick
• edit to understanding sections for purpose of controls and common purpose lisa.seeman
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Alastair Campbell
• Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose Joshue O Connor - InterAccess

Monday, 19 February 2018

• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose John Foliot
• RE: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose John Foliot
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose Katie Haritos-Shea
• implementations and techniques for 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 lisa.seeman
• Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Understanding merged and branches updated Joshue O Connor - InterAccess

Friday, 16 February 2018

• Understanding merged and branches updated Michael Cooper
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Researching @autocomplete for SC 1.3.4 John Foliot

Thursday, 15 February 2018

• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose White, Jason J
• Minutes from Thursday Feb 15 AGWG WG Discussion Glenda Sims
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 15 February 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose John Foliot
• Re: Agenda Thursday February 15 conference Greg Lowney
• coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading lisa.seeman
• Re: We have a location for the face to face Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose White, Jason J
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose Jonathan Avila
• Re: Agenda Thursday February 15 conference Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• We have a location for the face to face Andrew Kirkpatrick
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 8 February 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Fwd: [Online Symposium] ACT Rules for Manual Web Accessibility Evaluation Methodologies on 14 March 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra

Wednesday, 14 February 2018

• Re: Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" Chuck Adams
• Re: Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" Patrick H. Lauke
• Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" Chuck Adams
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose John Foliot
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose White, Jason J
• RE: Agenda Thursday February 15 conference Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Agenda Thursday February 15 conference Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose Jonathan Avila

Tuesday, 13 February 2018

• RE: MINUTES Tuesday February 13, 2018 White, Jason J
• Re: MINUTES Tuesday February 13, 2018 Laura Carlson
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose White, Jason J
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose John Foliot
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose White, Jason J
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose White, Jason J
• MINUTES Tuesday February 13, 2018 Michael Gower
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose John Foliot
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose Jonathan Avila
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose John Foliot
• Re: UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 Pietro Cirrincione
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose Jonathan Avila
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose Joshue O Connor - InterAccess

Monday, 12 February 2018

• Silver Progress Update for 4th Quarter 2017 to present Jeanne Spellman
• RE: UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 EA Draffan
• UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 8 February 2018

• Re: List Headings in Navigation Panels Mike Elledge
• RE: List Headings in Navigation Panels White, Jason J
• Re: List Headings in Navigation Panels Jim Allan
• List Headings in Navigation Panels Mike Elledge
• Re: objections RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Working Draft for personalization-semantics-content lisa.seeman
• RE: Re:RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 lisa.seeman
• objections RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 lisa.seeman
• Re: Detlev question about response to 733 Detlev (testkreis)

Wednesday, 7 February 2018

• Re: Response to Issue #761 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Detlev question about response to 733 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Response to Issue #761 Alastair Campbell
• No Thursday call this week Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Response to Issue #761 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Jim Allan
• Proposed response to issue 759 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Wilcock, Mark

Tuesday, 6 February 2018

• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 David MacDonald
• CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 Alastair Campbell
• RE: Re:RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 EA Draffan
• Re:RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 lisa.seeman
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 Pietro Cirrincione
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Chakravarthula, Srinivasu
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github Chakravarthula, Srinivasu

Monday, 5 February 2018

• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Léonie Watson
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis lisa.seeman
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Friday, 2 February 2018

• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Wayne Dick
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Glenda Sims
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Michael Gower
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis John Foliot
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Michael Cooper
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis John Foliot
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Michael Cooper
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Léonie Watson
• RE: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis White, Jason J
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Michael Cooper
• RE: "auto" response to new issues in Github Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis White, Jason J
• RE: "auto" response to new issues in Github Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 1 February 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Léonie Watson
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Wilcock, Mark
• RE: "auto" response to new issues in Github Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Laura Carlson
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Wayne Dick

Thursday, 1 February 2018

• RE: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis James Nurthen
• Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Michael Cooper
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis David MacDonald
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis EA Draffan
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Léonie Watson
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm John Foliot
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Alastair Campbell
• CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github David MacDonald
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Detlev Fischer (TK)
• "auto" response to new issues in Github Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm Marc Johlic
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm Laura Carlson
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Andreas Savva
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? EA Draffan
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Chakravarthula, Srinivasu
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm Andrew Kirkpatrick

Wednesday, 31 January 2018

• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Schnabel, Stefan
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Joshue O Connor
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Chris O'Brien
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? John Foliot
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Glenda Sims
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Denis Boudreau
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Eric Eggert
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Laura Carlson
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Steve Faulkner
• Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Glenda Sims
• RE: Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction Abma, J.D. (Jake)

Tuesday, 30 January 2018

• Re: Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Minutes: AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Jim Allan
• Some resources for writing WCAG techniques Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Glenda Sims
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Pietro Cirrincione
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Marc Johlic
• Call for Exclusions: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Xueyuan
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Michael Gower

Monday, 29 January 2018

• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Léonie Watson
• RE: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Michael Pluke
• RE: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Joshue O Connor
• RE: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January EA Draffan
• AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation lisa.seeman

Sunday, 28 January 2018

• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation White, Jason J
• RE: Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation John Foliot
• Re: OBJECTION Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation lisa.seeman
• OBJECTION Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation lisa.seeman

Saturday, 27 January 2018

• Re: making the draft for CR accurate Janina Sajka
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate Gregg Vanderheiden GPII

Friday, 26 January 2018

• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Léonie Watson
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Léonie Watson
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Léonie Watson
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) White, Jason J
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) Léonie Watson
• Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate Janina Sajka
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate Janina Sajka
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate lisa.seeman
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate Patrick H. Lauke
• Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate lisa.seeman

Thursday, 25 January 2018

• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey Philippe Le Hégaret
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey James Nurthen
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Mike Elledge
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Mike Elledge
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate Jonathan Avila
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate Andrew Kirkpatrick
• making the draft for CR accurate lisa.seeman
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 25 January 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: approving the draft for WCAG 2.1 John Foliot

Wednesday, 24 January 2018

• Re: approving the draft for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Example icons for non-text contrast Alastair Campbell
• Re: Example icons for non-text contrast Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Final issue responses for CR Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Updating understanding docs Michael Cooper

Tuesday, 23 January 2018

• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Repsher, Stephen J
• CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Minutes: AGWG telecon Tuesday, 23 Jan 2018 Glenda Sims
• Example icons for non-text contrast Alastair Campbell
• Re: RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd Mike Elledge
• RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd lisa.seeman
• Re: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd Pietro Cirrincione
• Re: Re[2]: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Updating understanding docs Alastair Campbell
• Re[2]: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Repsher, Stephen J

Monday, 22 January 2018

• Re: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd Detlev Fischer (TK)
• RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd EA Draffan
• AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Final issue responses for CR David MacDonald
• RE: CFC - Final issue responses for CR Bailey, Bruce
• Re: CFC - Final issue responses for CR Glenda Sims
• Small editorial changes to draft responses to issue #721 (RNIB) Detlev Fischer
• CFC - Final issue responses for CR Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Andrew Kirkpatrick

Sunday, 21 January 2018

• RE: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? Repsher, Stephen J

Saturday, 20 January 2018

• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Joshue O Connor
• CFC - Transition WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) White, Jason J
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast White, Jason J
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits White, Jason J
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) White, Jason J

Friday, 19 January 2018

• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Kim Patch
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Kim Patch
• RE: 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures White, Jason J
• Re: 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures James Nurthen
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Marc Johlic
• Re: 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures Andrew Kirkpatrick
• 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures James Nurthen
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses David MacDonald
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses lisa.seeman
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts White, Jason J

Thursday, 18 January 2018

• RE: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Alex Li (CELA)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Alex Li (CELA)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Marc Johlic
• RE: Reflow and aspect ratio Alastair Campbell
• RE: Discussiong for Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Jonathan Avila
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses lisa.seeman
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses John Foliot
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Hakkinen, Mark T
• Re: Animation from Interactions - ease-in-out John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing John Foliot
• Re: Discussiong for Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits John Foliot
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Discussiong for Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Marc Johlic
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) John Foliot
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call Wilcock, Mark
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Katie Haritos-Shea
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 18 January 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures John Foliot
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Jim Allan
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call EA Draffan
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Michael Gower
• Re: On The Side: (was Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus) Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Jim Allan
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Laura Carlson
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Jim Allan
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Alastair Campbell
• Agenda for Thursday January 18 call Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Animation from Interactions - ease-in-out Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts John Foliot
• RE: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) John Foliot
• On The Side: (was Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus) John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus John Foliot
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Hakkinen, Mark T
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Alastair Campbell
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Léonie Watson
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Léonie Watson
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• RE: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Laura Carlson
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Repsher, Stephen J
• notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches Gregg Vanderheiden GPII
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Jonathan Avila
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) Jonathan Avila
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Jonathan Avila
• CFC - Target Size (2 options) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Repsher, Stephen J
• CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Greg Lowney
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 James Nurthen
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Greg Lowney
• CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus Andrew Kirkpatrick

Wednesday, 17 January 2018

• CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday David MacDonald
• Re: Target size proposal Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Target size proposal Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts David MacDonald
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday David MacDonald
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts David MacDonald
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Michael Gower
• RE: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday Detlev Fischer
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Content on Hover or Focus Jim Allan
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Michael Gower
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> David MacDonald
• Re: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Target size proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Target size proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Target size proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Target size proposal Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Target size proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Target size proposal Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Michael Gower
• RE: Content on Hover or Focus Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts James Nurthen
• Re: Target size proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Content on Hover or Focus Repsher, Stephen J
• side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Michael Gower
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Graphics Contrast responses Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Jim Allan
• RE: Re[2]: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 White, Jason J
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 David MacDonald
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Michael Gower
• RE: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 White, Jason J
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 David MacDonald
• Re[4]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Michael Gower
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 162: Multi-document publications and meaningful sequence Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Alastair Campbell
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Alastair Campbell
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Michael Gower
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Re[2]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Joshue O Connor
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 David MacDonald
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 David MacDonald
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 Alastair Campbell
• Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 David MacDonald
• Re: Re[2]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• Re[2]: Target size proposal Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re[2]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re[2]: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Target size proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Draft Response for #721 (RNIB): Seven issues remain where I need your help... Patrick H. Lauke
• Draft Response for #721 (RNIB): Seven issues remain where I need your help... Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Alastair Campbell
• Re: Target size proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Léonie Watson
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Léonie Watson
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: Target size proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Detlev Fischer
• Re: Target size proposal Detlev Fischer
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• Re: Target size proposal David MacDonald
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Content on Hover or Focus David MacDonald
• RE: Target size proposal Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions David MacDonald
• Content on Hover or Focus Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Gregg Vanderheiden GPII
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Target size proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Target size proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions David MacDonald
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues John Foliot
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues John Foliot
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Laura Carlson
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Laura Carlson
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Alastair Campbell
• Re: Target size proposal Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 16 January 2018

• Re: Target size proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Target size proposal Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose John Foliot
• Target size proposal Alastair Campbell
• Proposal for: Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing David MacDonald
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... David MacDonald
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... David MacDonald
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... David MacDonald
• viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... Patrick H. Lauke
• MINUTES for Tuesday January 16 meeting Michael Gower
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting lisa.seeman
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Léonie Watson
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Please be on time for the call today Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting EA Draffan
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Alastair Campbell
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting Mike Elledge
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Laura Carlson
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Alastair Campbell
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting Pietro Cirrincione
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Léonie Watson
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re[4]: What can I do, you may ask? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Re[2]: What can I do, you may ask? David MacDonald
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Alastair Campbell
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Léonie Watson
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Léonie Watson
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Alastair Campbell
• RE: Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Léonie Watson
• Re: Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose Alastair Campbell
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Alastair Campbell
• Re: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Alastair Campbell
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Léonie Watson
• Re: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Léonie Watson
• Re: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• Re[2]: What can I do, you may ask? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? Alastair Campbell
• RE: What can I do, you may ask? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: What can I do, you may ask? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: pointer Gestures Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• pointer Gestures Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Patrick H. Lauke

Monday, 15 January 2018

• Re[2]: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Jim Allan
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose David MacDonald
• RE: What can I do, you may ask? Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Jonathan Avila
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 162: Multi-document publications and meaningful sequence Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Glenda Sims
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? Glenda Sims
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing EA Draffan
• Re: Pointer SC questions Jonathan Avila
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Michael Gower
• Re: Issue 719 David MacDonald
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" lisa.seeman
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose lisa.seeman
• Re: Issue 719 lisa.seeman
• RE: Pointer SC questions Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Issue 719 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 719 lisa.seeman
• RE: Finding agreement on common purpose White, Jason J
• Finding agreement on common purpose Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" lisa.seeman
• Re: Draft resonses to issues #715 and #717 David MacDonald
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" David MacDonald
• Pointer SC questions Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 Marc Johlic
• Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Agenda for Tuesday January 16, 2018 call Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Draft resonses to issues #715 and #717 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" Jim Allan
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Marc Johlic
• RE: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Laura Carlson
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Léonie Watson
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 John Foliot
• RE: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing White, Jason J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• RE: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts White, Jason J
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 lisa.seeman
• Re: CSUN F2F Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: CSUN F2F Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" John Foliot
• Re: CSUN F2F Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: CSUN F2F Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Common purpose - another AT lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities lisa.seeman
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording lisa.seeman
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Léonie Watson
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? Léonie Watson
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" Alastair Campbell
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Detlev Fischer (TK)
• What can I do, you may ask? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities David MacDonald
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" David MacDonald
• CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing David MacDonald
• CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording David MacDonald
• CFC - Response to issue 162: Multi-document publications and meaningful sequence Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" David MacDonald
• CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? Michael Gower
• CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Sunday, 14 January 2018

• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Jonathan Avila
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" David MacDonald
• CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" Gregg Vanderheiden GPII
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Fwd: Dealy in "Common Purposes" lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 lisa.seeman
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 lisa.seeman
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 lisa.seeman
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Jonathan Avila
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Public comments in Japanese Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Public comments in Japanese Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? Jonathan Avila

Saturday, 13 January 2018

• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald

Friday, 12 January 2018

• Re: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• Re: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? David MacDonald
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Michael Gower
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? White, Jason J
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? White, Jason J
• Re: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? Michael Gower
• RE: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 White, Jason J
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? White, Jason J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Michael Gower
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? James Nurthen
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? White, Jason J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Michael Gower
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• CSUN F2F Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• RE: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? White, Jason J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• Re: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? Michael Gower
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Alex Li (CELA)
• Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Glenda Sims
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Michael Gower
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Marc Johlic
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Michael Gower
• RE: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? John Foliot
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? White, Jason J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? White, Jason J
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics Michael Cooper
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics Alastair Campbell
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics David MacDonald
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics John Foliot
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Marc Johlic
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics Alastair Campbell
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics David MacDonald
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics David MacDonald
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics John Foliot
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics Léonie Watson
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics John Foliot
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics David MacDonald
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics Léonie Watson
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? Léonie Watson
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? David MacDonald
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics David MacDonald
• RE: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics White, Jason J
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics Alastair Campbell
• Possible wording for 1.3.4? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics John Foliot
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics David MacDonald
• Issue 719 - more important feedback in in favor lisa.seeman
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics lisa.seeman
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Common purpose. Feedback from EasyReading lisa.seeman
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics David MacDonald
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 David MacDonald
• general problem with CFCs lisa.seeman
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues lisa.seeman
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 lisa.seeman
• RE: Need Clarification on #170 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 11 January 2018

• RE: Guideline 2.6 text Michael Gower
• proposed responses to the purpose of controls issues lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 Laura Carlson
• Another implementation lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - response to issue 408 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• MINUTES for AGWG meeting Thursday, December 14 2017 Michael Gower
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 Jim Allan
• Meeting minutes Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to Issue 589 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Jim Allan
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call Wilcock, Mark
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Denis Boudreau
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call Greg Lowney
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Glenda Sims
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 David MacDonald
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 11 January 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Michael Gower
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call Bailey, Bruce
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 White, Jason J
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Hakkinen, Mark T
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Glenda Sims
• Re: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 John Foliot
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Denis Boudreau
• Re: Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Glenda Sims
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call Glenda Sims
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Wilcock, Mark
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Alastair Campbell
• Fwd: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics lisa.seeman
• Re: Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Updates to Respond to Motion Actuation comments Detlev Fischer
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 David MacDonald
• Re: Updates to Respond to Motion Actuation comments David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Alex Li (CELA)

Wednesday, 10 January 2018

• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Alastair Campbell
• RE: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Updates to Respond to Motion Actuation comments Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 John Foliot
• New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Michael Gower
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Detlev Fischer
• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 David MacDonald
• implementations for purpose of controls lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Jim Allan
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 David MacDonald
• CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• MINUTES for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 Michael Gower
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues White, Jason J
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Michael Pluke
• RE: Response to Issue 659/660/386 Jonathan Avila
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Jim Allan
• Re: Agenda for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 Michael Gower
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 John Foliot
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 Jim Allan
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Alastair Campbell
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues White, Jason J
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues White, Jason J
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text White, Jason J
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text Detlev Fischer
• RE: Agenda for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text Detlev Fischer
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text White, Jason J
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Alastair Campbell
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 520 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Detlev Fischer
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Guideline 2.6 text Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Agenda for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues David MacDonald
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 520 GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? White, Jason J

Tuesday, 9 January 2018

• Re: Telecon info Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET Glenda Sims
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Jonathan Avila
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• CFC - Response to Issue 520 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 520 Laura Carlson
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Repsher, Stephen J
• Updated spreadsheet of SCs David MacDonald
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Laura Carlson
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Jonathan Avila
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: Issue 520 GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Issue 520 Joshue O Connor - InterAccess
• Re: Issue 520 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - response to Issue 605 GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Issue 520 White, Jason J
• Issue 520 David MacDonald
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Telecon info Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• CFC - response to Issue 605 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Minutes AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 Detlev Fischer (TK)
• CFC - response to issue 408 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Telecon info Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET Michael Cooper
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Need Clarification on #170 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 Alastair Campbell
• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 Wilcock, Mark
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? White, Jason J
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Melanie Philipp
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? White, Jason J
• single pointer definition updated Detlev Fischer (TK)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.

Monday, 8 January 2018

• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues #1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 White, Jason J
• UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 lisa.seeman
• Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET David MacDonald
• Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: regrets EA Draffan
• regrets lisa.seeman
• Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald

Sunday, 7 January 2018

• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Joshue O Connor
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald

Saturday, 6 January 2018

• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? Alastair Campbell
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 White, Jason J
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 White, Jason J
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Detlev Fischer
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? David MacDonald
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 James Nurthen
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Michael Pluke
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Alex Li (CELA)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 White, Jason J

Friday, 5 January 2018

• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes John Foliot
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 Alex Li (CELA)
• RE: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes White, Jason J
• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes White, Jason J
• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes David MacDonald
• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes John Foliot
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 James Nurthen
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 James Nurthen
• extra call next week Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 David MacDonald
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module Janina Sajka

Thursday, 4 January 2018

• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 James Nurthen
• Response to Issue 659/660/386 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• AGWG @ CSUN 2018? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: CFC - Issue 150 response kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: CFC - Issue 619 response kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Minutes from 1/4/18 call Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Issue 619 response White, Jason J
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 Glenda Sims
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 4 January 2018 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response John Foliot
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 Laura Carlson
• RE: CFC - Issue 150 response Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Issue 619 response Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 Joshue O Connor

Wednesday, 3 January 2018

• RE: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 Michael Pluke
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response Denis Boudreau
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response Glenda Sims
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 Detlev Fischer
• AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: [w3c/wcag21] IBM comment 3 on 1.3.5 Contextual Information (#430) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response John Foliot
• Re: Identifiers John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses (-1, objection) David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists Jim Allan
• Identifiers Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses (-1, objection) Rochford, John
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response White, Jason J
• RE: CFC - Issue 150 response White, Jason J
• RE: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response John Foliot
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response Jim Allan
• Re: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Animation from Interactions and issue responses Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC - Identify Purpose SC and issue responses Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Accessible Authentication and issue responses White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response David MacDonald
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response David MacDonald
• Cross domain complexity, was: Accessible Authentication and issue responses Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response Laura Carlson
• CFC - Issue 150 response Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Issue 630 response Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Issue 619 response Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 2 January 2018

• RE: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses White, Jason J
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call Alastair Campbell
• WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• Today's call - agenda addition request John Foliot
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call Greg Lowney
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call James Nurthen
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses Alastair Campbell
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses Alastair Campbell
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses Alastair Campbell
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call Wilcock, Mark
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call Laura Carlson

Monday, 1 January 2018

• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call EA Draffan
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call Pietro Cirrincione
• Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call Andrew Kirkpatrick

Last message date: Friday, 30 March 2018 18:54:25 UTC