- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:41:12 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Alastair, Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/04/03-ag-minutes.html#item18 CFC mail: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2018AprJun/0184.html Kindest Regards, Laura On 6/22/18, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Laura, > > On the face of it, I think any use of default focus indicator would > constitute a fail of the wide interpretation, unless you had a very narrow > user-agent support list. > > That's quite a lot sites (like w3.org) who assume the default is ok. > > I'd like to dig into the rationale / connect behind that decision before > considering if the same though. > > Thanks, > > Alastair > > > Sent from my phone, apologies for typos. > ________________________________ > From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 7:54 pm > To: Alastair Campbell; John Foliot > Cc: GLWAI Guidelines WG org > Subject: Re: SC 1.4.11 > > Hi John, Alastair, and all, > > I wonder how many existing implementations would be in violation of > the wide interpretation versus the narrow interpretation. > > The WG decision for 1.4.13 Content on Hover exception was because: > > "As many existing implementations would be in violation of this > success criteria, the decision was made to allow this exception. > Removing this exception will be considered in future guidelines." [1] > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/829 > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 20:41:36 UTC