Re: SC 1.4.11

Hi Alastair,

Call minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2018/04/03-ag-minutes.html#item18

CFC mail:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2018AprJun/0184.html

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On 6/22/18, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
> Hi Laura,
>
> On the face of it, I think any use of default focus indicator would
> constitute a fail of the wide interpretation, unless you had a very narrow
> user-agent support list.
>
> That's quite a lot sites (like w3.org) who assume the default is ok.
>
> I'd like to dig into the rationale / connect  behind that decision before
> considering if the same though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alastair
>
>
> Sent from my phone, apologies for typos.
> ________________________________
> From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 7:54 pm
> To: Alastair Campbell; John Foliot
> Cc: GLWAI Guidelines WG org
> Subject: Re: SC 1.4.11
>
> Hi John, Alastair, and all,
>
> I wonder how many existing implementations would be in violation of
> the wide interpretation versus the narrow interpretation.
>
> The WG decision for 1.4.13 Content on Hover exception was because:
>
> "As many existing implementations would be in violation of this
> success criteria, the decision was made to allow this exception.
> Removing this exception will be considered in future guidelines." [1]
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/829
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 20:41:36 UTC