> ... IMO within the twin cultures of MVP and minimum compliance without
the push of that 30% nothing more would be done.
I hope that proves to be true. History will tell ... In the meantime, I
suggest we not get too strident in the interpretation of our new SCs, until
we see what happens with what we've put out there. We
​ say in our standard​
"The Working Group considers that WCAG 2.1 incrementally advances web
content accessibility guidance for all these areas..."
Let's keep it "incremental" ...
Cheers,
David MacDonald
*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel: 613.235.4902
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd
GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
* Adapting the web to all users*
* Including those with disabilities*
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Joshue O Connor - InterAccess <
josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:
> David MacDonald wrote:
>
> These fast implementation cycles are based on the AGILE world... and in
> the AGILE world we also have Minimal Viable product (MVP) delivery which
> I'd say we've overstepped a bit with a 30% increase with this version.
> Let's not widen it further right now.
>
> While I hear your point, I don't think we have overstepped at all. IMO
> within the twin cultures of MVP and minimum compliance without the push
> of that 30% nothing more would be done.
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie
>