Re: CFC - Edit to Non-text Contrast

+1,
The LVTF discussed 1.4.11 today. It is the view of  the LVTF is that the SC
as proposed did not intend to require boundaries on every UI Component and
that the gestalt approach to identifying controls is recognized as a valid,
even if imperfect, approach.

Jim

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:01 PM Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday May 31st at 1:00pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed a change to the 1.4.11 SC text (non-text
> contrast). This issue was discussed on the May 29 call (
> https://www.w3.org/2018/05/29-ag-minutes.html) and  survey (
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/1_4_11_intent/results) and the
> consensus view of the Working Group is that the changes to the SC text
> accurately reflect the intent of the SC when written by the Working Group.
>
>
>
> The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/945
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964