Re: Abstract update - new content terms

+1

JF

On Wed, May 23, 2018, 12:05 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> We spoke about an update to the Abstract of WCAG 2.1 on Tuesday, and the
> wording used to balance between “WCAG 2.0 is still totally valid” and
> “Please use the updated version”.
>
>
>
> A couple of people mentioned they were concerned about the “new & updated
> bit” here:
>
> “The publication of WCAG 2.1 does not deprecate or supersede WCAG 2.0.
> While WCAG 2.0 remains a W3C Recommendation, the *W3C recommends that new
> and updated content use WCAG 2.1 to maximize future applicability of
> accessibility efforts*. The W3C also advises that new or updated Web
> accessibility policies reference WCAG 2.1.”
>
>
>
> Can we simplify that by just removing the new & updated bit?
>
> “The publication of WCAG 2.1 does not deprecate or supersede WCAG 2.0.
> While WCAG 2.0 remains a W3C Recommendation, the W3C advises the use of
> WCAG 2.1 to maximize future applicability of accessibility efforts. The
> W3C also advises that new or updated Web accessibility policies reference
> WCAG 2.1.”
>
>
>
> You can see the proposed updates (apart from the above) in context in the
> diff view here:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/903/files
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fpull%2F903%2Ffiles&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C3738770d19ca4d04471108d5c08363a2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636626592908805500&sdata=CGbQHF4np7PhBjdcMZgcGGZV0%2BUoAk5nx4mqr8rGMus%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> www.nomensa.com
> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
> follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
> Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT
>
>
>
> Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411
>