Hi Wayne No it has nothing to do with any SC nor was it changing requirements. It was an editorial issue. Andrew has reported that since we are in PR the proposal to remove the note is a non starter (unless brought up by a member organization with an objection). Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: > I certainly hope this does not mean that a person who needs 300% > enlargement for a 1280px resolution, may not get reflow or spacing. Please > clarify this. > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 4:53 PM David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> "we just checked the mobile view" >> >> In addition to the desktop view, of course... and spot checks >> elsewhere... >> >> Cheers, >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >> >> Tel: 613.235.4902 >> >> LinkedIn >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >> >> twitter.com/davidmacd >> >> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> >> >> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> >> >> >> >> * Adapting the web to all users* >> * Including those with disabilities* >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy >> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> :-) >>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2018 00:30:55 UTC