+1 Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: > +++++++1 to all of this! > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 7:36 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Michael, (and everyone, question at the end) >> >> >> >> Just to pick up the conversation after the call, where you said: >> >> >> >> > The advantages are obvious: the reader gains an immediate >> understanding of what they doing (mine) and why (Glenda's), which is often >> not the case from the SC language. >> >> >> >> For consistency with the 2.0 docs I think your suggested summary >> statements make sense as the first sentence if you pre-pend them with “The >> intent of this Success Criterion (SC) is to…” >> >> >> >> It would be a useful “polishing” exercise once we’ve got the major >> drafting & reviews done, I’d rather not interrupt that momentum by making >> changes across the various branches just yet. >> >> >> >> I’ve added an issue for tracking, all going well, something to tackle >> next week: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/882 >> >> >> >> As Andrew said, there was general agreement to adding the personas to the >> understanding documents (perhaps with hesitation about the number of >> updates involved?). >> >> >> >> As Glenda has taken that on (with help), is everyone happy with the >> location and format suggested? Taking Laura’s as example: >> >> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/text-spacing/understanding/21/ >> text-spacing.html >> >> >> >> Something short & snappy like that seems appropriate, with a consistent >> format across the docs. Perhaps with one name only, rather than two names >> associated with one quote? >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2018 05:44:28 UTC