- From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 06:45:20 -0700
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <OF5C539654.24FAC4D1-ON88258279.0049B12F-88258279.004B88EA@notes.na.collabserv.c>
+1 I think any predictable enhancement we can add to improve rapid comprehension is worthy of consideration. Like Glenda, I took a stab at some form of a quick summation of the SC in plain language. The only difference is that where she has humanized the reason for the SC with a persona, I tried to simplify the objective for the author. My one-sentence attempts are here: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/age-and-ability/2018/02/08/simplifying-new-wcag-2-1-guidelines/ Both of these approaches could be considered for SCs; they are in some ways complementary. It's possible to append them to existing Understanding documents. Laura has put the persona in a predictable location inside an existing section. Alternatively, they also seem to potentially fit into two different parts of the SC, by shoving each into the top of a section: Intent (simplified) and Benefits (persona). The advantages are obvious: the reader gains an immediate understanding of what they doing (mine) and why (Glenda's), which is often not the case from the SC language. There are some disadvantages, the most obvious of which is that any time one simplifies, one loses a lot of nuance. But given either of these approaches would be appearing inside a document that elaborates on that nuance, I think it's a worthwhile 'risk'. Since I recognized the challenges of getting buy-in for adding simplified language call outs, i just tried to bake simplified language into the first sentence of the Intent document on Understanding docs I updated. This could be a less intrusive way of adding either. But I think callouts catch user's attention, and are a more effective means. Michael Gower IBM Accessibility Research 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com cellular: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> To: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: 2018-04-24 05:12 AM Subject: Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? Hi Alastair, Josh, Andrew, Glenda, and all, I am wondering if we are going to be adding Persona Quotes to each Understanding Document? Last January, Glenda proposed that question to the Group, and folks seemed to be very much in favor of it [1]. I added one to the Text Spacing doc from one Glenda's excellent 2.1 articles [2] [3] [4] (she has great quotes for all of of the SCs). But I have noticed that none of the other Understanding documents have Persona Quotes. Should I remove the one from Text Spacing to match the other SCs? Thoughts? Thanks. Kindest Regards, Laura [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.w3.org_Archives_Public_w3c-2Dwai-2Dgl_2018JanMar_thread.html-23msg1057&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=qmbpJ7dabO4hjrIkGDIeYz1cPdnyVFambE06bu14Srk&s=C-bhLSFx21p5yFh_zqCNgV7LvURKh0YKRQpGGQMqD6U&e= [2] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.deque.com_blog_wcag-2D2-2D1-2Dvision-2Dsuccess-2Dcriteria_&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=qmbpJ7dabO4hjrIkGDIeYz1cPdnyVFambE06bu14Srk&s=a72GfI0q0v4kt7wlDf5ZJLsLSyAcyWCbO8CbrtqSrrQ&e= [3] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.deque.com_blog_understanding-2Dwcag-2D2-2D1-2Dreviewing-2Dcognitive-2Dsuccess-2Dcriteria_&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=qmbpJ7dabO4hjrIkGDIeYz1cPdnyVFambE06bu14Srk&s=EodrHKLoRbJiBzYsj7IOCq_d2YiRaZB4mpl_BAj7104&e= [4] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.deque.com_blog_understanding-2Dwcag-2D2-2D1-2Dreviewing-2Dmobile-2Dsuccess-2Dcriteria_&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=qmbpJ7dabO4hjrIkGDIeYz1cPdnyVFambE06bu14Srk&s=QW_iT8034ag2rd0zQI-s0NMAbHxpLWhJ9sq9t0MkqH0&e= On 1/31/18, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote: > Dear AG, > > I have this idea. What do y'all think of the possibility of adding a new > piece to WCAG 2.1 Understanding docs...called...."Persona Quotes". > > *Example for SC Orientation (AA)* > > - *Persona(s):* > - *Disability Type:* Motor > - *Quote:* "Don't force me to rotate my mobile device. My mobile > device is attached to my wheelchair in portrait mode. I > cannot rotate my > mobile device by myself." > > *Example for SC Text Reflow (AA)* > > - *Persona(s)* > - *Disability Type:* Low Vision > - *Parameter: * Reading horizontal text: (example: English) > - *Quote: * "Horizontal scrolling is evil! I'm trying to read > a paragraph of English text and I have to scroll right on > every line and > then scroll left for the next line. The cognitive > overhead for reading > this way prevents me from being able to focus fully on the > content." > - *Research:* https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nosetothepage.org_Fitz_2dScroll.html&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=qmbpJ7dabO4hjrIkGDIeYz1cPdnyVFambE06bu14Srk&s=oGVZBpKk7uvNJe8XNGOMKjUzEZtBynJBxxC8Y8zLET0&e= > - *Parameter:* 'Reading vertical text (example: Japanese) > - *Quote: * "Vertical scrolling is evil! I'm trying to read a > paragraph of text and I have to scroll down on every line > and then scroll > up to get to the next line. The cognitive overhead for > reading this way > prevents me from being able to focus on the content." > > I think persona quotes could help in a number of ways: > > - Make it easier for you to understand the new SC. > - Help you see the reason the new SC exists. > - Create desire to prevent barriers that hurt real people. > > What do y'all think? > G > > glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 > *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals > > [image: IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals: > Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)] > < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.accessibilityassociation.org_certification&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=qmbpJ7dabO4hjrIkGDIeYz1cPdnyVFambE06bu14Srk&s=IDK8KChYeyYyJJXDILpDLln5OCAXt3KBOvb2zno-Fac&e= > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2018 13:57:16 UTC