Re: CFC - At Risk Items in Proposed Rec.

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L. <
rbradley@mitre.org> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2018 12:48 PM
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CFC - At Risk Items in Proposed Rec.
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday April 13th at 12:30 Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed the status of At Risk items in the CR
> publication. We had a survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/
> wbs/35422/AtRiskItems/results) and in discussing this on the call decided
> that we would not exercise the At Risk option to remove any of the three SC
> from the Proposed Recommendation.
>
>
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/04/10-ag-minutes.html#item01
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>