RE: CFC - Animation from Interactions and issue responses

+1, but we should consider a simple change to use “mechanism is available” instead of “can be” for testability and consistency with other SC, i.e. it should read:

“A mechanism is available to disable animations triggered by user interaction, unless the animation is essential.”

(Also makes an editorial drop of “to the information…” – this is built into the definition of essential).

Steve

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 11:55 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Animation from Interactions and issue responses
Importance: High

Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday January 2nd at 11:45PM Boston time.

The Working Group has discussed a change to the note in the Animation from Interactions SC.

The specific changes are detailed in this pull request (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/647)  and can be viewed at http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/animation-update/guidelines/index.html#animation-from-interactions.


Issue responses: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/2-2-9_Revision


 Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/12/21-ag-minutes.html#item05


If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>