Re: some questions: : working on re-authentication

SO i think the old version leaves it unclear that it would fail.The user agent is not actively blocked from filling it in (such as setting autocomplete="off") rather it is not supported autofil. 
Hence I prefer the wording requiring that it is supported, rather then it is "not blocked"


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:32:33 +0200 Alastair Campbell<acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote ---- 

      > My bank (the example from hell) gives you different login number/card number where a "user id"  needs to match a password. 
  
 Perhaps I’m missing something, but  unless login/card number is marked as ‘username’ it would not meet the exception, therefore fail because you have to memorise or transcribe the number.
  
 Cheers,
  
 -Alastair