- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 23:17:40 +0200
- To: Abma <Jake.Abma@ing.nl>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'David MacDonald'" <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Message-Id: <16075c82871.127cc6163128907.6374801151117184387@zoho.com>
Hi Jeanee from Pacelo group suggested the following wording that may solve some of our issues. I also added a definition of interruptions that could eliminate others issues by excluding offering help relating to the main topic or purpose of the content : Interruptions minimum (AA) Changes that move focus or interrupt the display of content are deliberately user initiated, or are necessitated by an emergency . (Level AA) Exceptions: Interruptions and changes of focus are allowed when they are essential to the main purpose of the content or, when they are a required part of a real-time event (for example, an auction) or can be automatically suppressed by the user though the operating system or user agent. definitions Interruption: (we can work on this if we like the direction...) new content such as a popup, overlay, or message that may distract the user from the main topic or purpose of the content Deliberately user initiated: An intentional discrete action by the user such as clicking, pressing a key or speaking a voice command. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:31:01 +0200 Abma<Jake.Abma@ing.nl> wrote ---- +1 to David, The company / bank I work for is building a complete new environment using AI where we especially try to trigger customers into new products from our data / black box where this may and may not be related to main purpose. Suppressing new content not directly related to main topic undermines the complete system and this SC in its current form will be ignored by definition. Regards, Jake Abma Accessibility Lead ING Product owner at Team A11Y ING Nederland / CIO / Omnichannel / Experience ACT B.02.166, Bijlmerdreef 24 Postbus 1800, 1000 BV Amsterdam 0031 (0)6 - 25 27 52 46 jake.abma@ing.nl From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] Sent: dinsdag 19 december 2017 22:27 To: Gregg Vanderheiden GPII <gregg@raisingthefloor.org> Cc: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>; w3c-waI-gl@w3. org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: interruptions I think we have to consider web sites where the advertiser is not 3rd party... but rather a site that is a commercial site that has its own commercials. Cheers, David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc. Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub http://www.can-adapt.com/ Adapting the web to all users Including those with disabilities If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden GPII <gregg@raisingthefloor.org> wrote: What about the ability to ‘click’ on it and have it go dormant. still there but not changing. G On Dec 19, 2017, at 3:12 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: Hi we are stuck on the interruptions. The main issue seems to be the difficulty seems to be we are stuck on adverting. I think we all know the need but there was a lot of concern that this will interfere with many sites need to make money though advertising. Can anyone think of a way around this? The only thing i can think of is to scope the SC to important information, critical services and payed for services. It would be great if anyone else has a better idea (or if you think this is acceptable) The current wording would be: a mechanism is available for to postpone or suppress new content that does not directly relate to the main topic or purpose of the content unless it is essential, initiated by the user, involves an emergency or if the content is not funded by the user or user representative and does not contain a critical service or important information. we had these defined in earlier versions as follows.... critical service [Proposed] service that is needed to prevent significant harm, risk or loss such as: significant financial loss, illness, injury or deterioration in a patient's condition or effective loss of rights or freedoms Important information [Proposed] information the user may need to complete any action or task including an offline task, or related to safety, risks, privacy, health or opportunities funded by the user or user representative proposed definition - the user or a representative of the user, such as a gardeain, has paid money to use the content or may spend money on the site such as, eCommerce sites, or subscription services . (this needs work but you get the point...) All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately. -----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2017 21:18:16 UTC