- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:26:55 -0500
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden GPII <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
- Cc: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDa85XE+URa8Wj3A1pDLyDVCC=i7ANAyg4=3GG8HmTrLPg@mail.gmail.com>
I think we have to consider web sites where the advertiser is not 3rd party... but rather a site that is a commercial site that has its own commercials. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden GPII < gregg@raisingthefloor.org> wrote: > What about the ability to ‘click’ on it and have it go dormant. still > there but not changing. > > G > > > On Dec 19, 2017, at 3:12 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > > Hi > > we are stuck on the interruptions. The main issue seems to be the > difficulty seems to be we are stuck on adverting. I think we all know the > need but there was a lot of concern that this will interfere with many > sites need to make money though advertising. > > Can anyone think of a way around this? > > The only thing i can think of is to scope the SC to important information, > critical services and payed for services. It would be great if anyone else > has a better idea (or if you think this is acceptable) > > > The current wording would be: > a mechanism is available for to postpone or suppress new content that > does not directly relate to the main topic or purpose of the content unless > it is essential, initiated by the user, involves an emergency or if the > content is not funded by the user or user representative and does not > contain a critical service or important information. > > we had these defined in earlier versions as follows.... > > > critical service > > [Proposed] > > service that is needed to prevent significant harm, risk or loss such as: > significant financial loss, illness, injury or deterioration in a patient's > condition or effective loss of rights or freedoms > > Important information > > [Proposed] > > information the user may need to complete any action or task including an > offline task, or related to safety, risks, privacy, health or opportunities > > funded by the user or user representative > proposed definition - > the user or a representative of the user, such as a gardeain, has paid > money to use the content or may spend money on the site such as, > eCommerce sites, or subscription services . > > (this needs work but you get the point...) > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:27:21 UTC