- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:03:30 -0500
- To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Cc: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-apa <public-apa@w3.org>
Hi, All: Speaking up to agree with Josh and Michael. The hollidays are not an opportunity for doing anything useful with the Gap Analysis publication, or with our directives regarding future publication. I believe I tried to say this in our last telephone coord conversation about the FPWD. Janina Joshue O Connor writes: > Lisa, > We'll have to wait until after the holidays. > Thanks > Josh > InterAccess - Accessible UX > -------- Original message --------From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> Date: 18/12/2017 23:17 (GMT+00:00) To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> Cc: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-apa <public-apa@w3.org> Subject: Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module > > I don't think we should attempt to get any consensus like that > from the WGs until after the holidays at this point, and I did > warn that the chairs might not be able to put it on the agenda > before the holidays when we discussed this a couple weeks ago. Now > too many people are away already and a standing publication > consent, which is a big decision, shouldn't be snuck through in > that situation. > > > Even if you convince the chairs and manage to obtain it, I do not > support publishing before January when there can be sufficient > review of the proposed draft. I encourage Lisa and Roy to work > over the next couple weeks on preparing a draft that is ready for > review, but Roy please do not publish it until after the task > force (and I) can take a look in January. > > > While I suggested obtaining a standing consent to publish, I > meant that to remove some bureaucracy, not to remove the task > force from the process. A draft published over the holiday would > only have editor input, not sufficient task force and WG input, > and that is not sufficient review for publication even with a > standing consent on the record. > > > Michael > > > > > On 18/12/2017 4:45 PM, lisa.seeman > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Folks > > > > The COGA Gap analysis and road map has been published with > extremely out of date information. The user research module is > also very out of data. Can we have the working groups consent > to publish incremental working drafts of the Gap analysis/ > road map and user research module without going though a CFC > process each time from both working groups. That way Roy and > me might be able to get the current draft updated over the > holiday. > > All the best > > > > Lisa Seeman > > > > LinkedIn, Twitter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 13:05:12 UTC