RE: wording for interruptions

As noted in the survey, I suggest changing “the application” to “the content” for greater generality and to avoid questions about what kinds of content are “applications” for purposes of WCAG.

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 2:49 PM
To: W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: wording for interruptions

Hi Folks

we have better wording suggested at  at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/2.2.7_Revision<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2F2.2.7_Revision&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C01d1fb4f79034ea4cf2608d54650e20d%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636492235570657807&sdata=7mlX%2Bb6YrJS6pzntohIyGk4SwwymmGTLiGbyIaZJpjI%3D&reserved=0> It seems to address the comments we received on this issue. Does anyone have an objection to it?

I added  " contextual help overlay" to the list of exclusions to address an additional comment.


"A mechanism is available to postpone and suppress unnecessary interruptions and changes in content, unless they are initiated by the user or involve an emergency.

Definition: Unnecessary interruptions: Secondary information, pop-ups, overlays or actions that are not part of the workflow sequence or the key purpose of the application. Note: Error, success, and warning messages; a contextual help overlay; timeout notifications, live updates when the purpose of the application is monitoring are not unnecessary interruptions".



I have also put comments into all of the comments from Mike's link , hopefully they are all now addressed with the new wording.

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fil.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Flisaseeman%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C01d1fb4f79034ea4cf2608d54650e20d%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636492235570657807&sdata=YdUtFnegMWH739UmlIeU1rEhNFyNNbn6nTf9zGYED0I%3D&reserved=0>, Twitter<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FSeemanLisa&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C01d1fb4f79034ea4cf2608d54650e20d%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636492235570657807&sdata=friFNAJxWGqscxkiJgmUGFFw12FjporEszgseOXBYx4%3D&reserved=0>




________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Monday, 18 December 2017 19:56:42 UTC