Re: coga comments on understanding sections

Hi Mike

The published version looked quite good. You had some questions that we can talk though but the only comments from the task force was to expand the techniques section , however at this point we can start t do them seprately so i am not sure if that is needed. We started drafting some techniques at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YiknHDDDdKBdwVTEpxwUpyCaQL_tnpp9CfDlFjCq16E/edit#heading=h.sq4y0gatnmwq
but I think this is Ok for now. 

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:55:05 +0200 Michael Gower<michael.gower@ca.ibm.com> wrote ---- 

Hi Lisa,
The Intent and examples sections of Interruptions (Minimum) in your Google doc looks like they have not been modified since I used that doc as the basis for my first draft (which is now the published version). Can anyone on the Task Force advise what they want changed? For example, does the TF with me to:wholly replace the published version with this Google docs version?
augment the published version with the techniques listed in the Google doc?
include the 'expected results' material in a specific Sufficient Technique, and if so, which one? That material does not go in the Understanding doc.

Just let me know how you wish me to proceed.
Thanks,
Michael Gower
IBM Accessibility
Research

1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC  V8T 5C3
gowerm@ca.ibm.com
voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 *  fax: (250) 220-8034



From:        "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
To:        Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
Cc:        "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Date:        2017-12-13 07:22 AM
Subject:        Re: coga comments on understanding sections



Thank you Mike

Our understanding section is at https://docs.google.com/document/d/13hmoaVU563kTio1EZD5mbNxcc0k924qVdZZwWckcbu0/edit.
It may be a bit out of date . feel free to ping me on skype if you have any questions (lisaseeman)

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter




---- On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:31:50 +0200 Michael Gower<michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>wrote ---- 
Hi Lisa,
I'm down as the owner for Interruptions (Minimum) and happy to populate the branch with whatever material the Task Force wants. I put in an initial draft of the Intent and Benefits sections two months ago and haven't seen any responses to my questions or new changes by anyone, so I'm assuming the TF has written a different version in a Google doc?
Send me that material and I will populate in the branch, which will help with one of the tasks you were asking for help with.

Thanks,
Michael Gower
IBM Accessibility
Research

1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC  V8T 5C3
gowerm@ca.ibm.com
voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 *  fax: (250) 220-8034



From:        "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
To:        "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Date:        2017-12-12 08:23 AM
Subject:        coga comments on understanding sections



Hi Folks

We have been collecting the comments from the COGA TFon the understanding sections for our SC's.

I will try and put any suggestions in branches tomorrow. 

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter