- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:57:10 -0500
- To: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDZqC6+SuRQHzAmumJva+upJ2QBpNe4qjx-Hyc=Yi1-j3Q@mail.gmail.com>
ā> Iā understand that there is a usability advantage to using that method, but there is an accessibility requirement for being able to avoid it. I'm not sure we have determined the metrics of provocation. Interesting collision between usability and accessibility, which happens occasionally ā, but I'm not sure we want to jump into that debate without more information.ā Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > Right, and we can capture usability considerations as advisory techniques > as well as in the understanding doc > > Michael Gower > IBM Accessibility > Research > > 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1803+Douglas+Street,+Victoria,+BC+%C2%A0V8T+5C3&entry=gmail&source=g> > V8T 5C3 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1803+Douglas+Street,+Victoria,+BC+%C2%A0V8T+5C3&entry=gmail&source=g> > gowerm@ca.ibm.com > voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 > > > > From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Michael Gower < > michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Date: 2017-12-15 06:59 AM > Subject: Re: motion or scaling animations > ------------------------------ > > > > What I mean is that authors should be add their own slow scroll, because > it shows users they moving on the same page, not going to another page. > > > > Sure, but then the author should provide the ability to turn it off. > Either by preference or an on-screen mechanism. > > > > I understand that there is a usability advantage to using that method, but > there is an accessibility requirement for being able to avoid it. > > > > -Alastair > > > > >
Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 16:57:37 UTC