W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2017

Re: We're going to need to make our drafts responsive to meet Reflow SC

From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 16:02:13 -0500
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, WCAG Editors <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6d989cfb-a6d1-c75e-0769-8937b7eb58d0@w3.org>
The "Respec" overlay is only in the rawgit versions, it is not in the 
w3c.github.io official editors' draft nor the official working draft.

If I get the concern from Alastair's image, I can say that the spec 
status background image, and the overlay with those arrowy thingys are 
present in the official drafts. They are required elements of the 
official W3C TR design. Issues on those features should be raised at 


On 07/12/2017 3:49 PM, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> Hi David,
> If it weren’t for the “Respec” overlay and dodgy “Editors Draft” image 
> background, they would already be there.
> In fact, the Respec thing is annoying but doesn’t actually prevent you 
> getting to the content.
> The background image is clunky and you can’t see some of it, but I’m 
> assuming that goes when it’s published?
> https://alastairc.ac/tmp/spec-screenshot.png
> Considering those are two small items on a very big page, it’s minor 
> stuff.
> Cheers,
> -Alastair
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2017 21:02:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:18 UTC