Re: Branch for latest Pointer Gestures SC

>> We may still need to settle for either 'single pointer activation' or
'single point activation' - I would prefer the latter but not sure what it
sounds like to native speakers.

​It sounds fine to me... I find "point" easier to understand... although I
know the "Pointer" events terminology has some merit

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Detlev Fischer (TK) <
detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote:

> Hi Steve
>
> Am 27.11.2017 um 21:55 schrieb Repsher, Stephen J:
>
>>
>> Is there a branch on GitHub which contains the latest Pointer Gestures SC
>> language?  Just want to make sure any suggestions I make for Accidental
>> Activation plays well with it and would prefer to branch off the latest.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> The branch with the latest language (on top of the understanding
> document) is here:
>
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/pointer-gestures/understanding
> /21/pointer-gestures.html
>
> We may still need to settle for either 'single pointer activation' or
> 'single point activation' - I would prefer the latter but not sure what it
> sounds like to native speakers.
>
> I have now changed the SC text as well but it has not yet been merged into
> the Master (if I understand this correctly).
> The pull request is
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/584
>
> Detlev
>
> *Steve Repsher*
>>
>> Twitter <https://twitter.com/steverep> | LinkedIn <
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/steverepsherjr/> | GitHub <
>> https://github.com/steverep>
>>
>>
>
>