Re: Interaction of "zoom content" and vertical writing modes

Hi Alastair,

Re: "both" - transcription error

Re: the note - I feel that my suggestion is more explicit, is all.

JF

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

>
>    - Content can be zoomed to an equivalent width of 320 CSS pixels
>    without loss of content or functionality, and without requiring horizontal
>    or vertical scrolling of the text content.
>
>    NOTE: for most Western-based languages, that would be requiring no
>    horizontal scrolling, for vertical-based languages, that would be requiring
>    no vertical scrolling.
>
>
>
> It looks like you removed the ‘both’ from the SC, so we can’t have
> scrolling at all?! (I.e. it has to fit in a 320px box.)
>
> I’m assuming that wasn’t intended.
>
>
>
> I’m not sure what the note improves over the current:
>
> “For web pages which are designed to scroll horizontally, the 320px should
> be taken as the height rather than width.”
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>



-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion