Re: Issues with Target Size SC

I disagree that an AAA version with no caveats (exceptions) and a target req. of 44 x 44 would be useful. Any site with text and links in it would struggle to meet it. 
I think we need to make a wholesale exception for inline targets in blocks of text  - and keep 44 x 22 to make this easier to achieve across design scenarios.
A no-exceptions AAA version with 44 x 22 is also feasible.
However, I still strongly believe there is value in putting this onto level AA even in a form that allows exceptions. It puts the issue on the map. Authors will suddenly start to think about target size. I believe many are absolutely unaware that it is an issue. On level AAA, no one will bother.

Sent from phone

> Am 24.11.2017 um 16:44 schrieb John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>:
> 
> +1 to Alastair's suggestion (Move to AAA with no caveats)
> 
> JF
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 24/11/2017 09:42, Alastair Campbell wrote:
>>> My suggestion would be to have the caveat-free version at AAA, and include ‘large hit targets’ as a best-practice in the associated doc(s) as Patrick suggested.
>> 
>> I could live with that :)
>> 
>> 
>> P
>> -- 
>> Patrick H. Lauke
>> 
>> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
>> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> John Foliot
> Principal Accessibility Strategist
> Deque Systems Inc.
> john.foliot@deque.com
> 
> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion