Re: Interaction of "zoom content" and vertical writing modes

Notes can't be used to create new requirements. If the vertical issue is
not in the SC, it can't be freshly introduced in a note as an additional
requirement.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> > Since there seems to be agreement this is primarily future proofing, can
> we cover it with a note?
>
>
>
> That would be my preference, and it’s already there!
>
>
>
> “320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a starting viewport width of 1280 CSS
> pixels wide at 400% zoom. For web pages which are designed to scroll
> horizontally, the 320px should be taken as the height rather than width.”
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 24 November 2017 00:30:47 UTC