W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2017

Re: Interaction of "zoom content" and vertical writing modes

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 19:30:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDaDtUOg5W9NE9ShbRgeA9B-Uwz+=9hRna6RKLT7O0-kRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Notes can't be used to create new requirements. If the vertical issue is
not in the SC, it can't be freshly introduced in a note as an additional
requirement.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> > Since there seems to be agreement this is primarily future proofing, can
> we cover it with a note?
>
>
>
> That would be my preference, and it’s already there!
>
>
>
> “320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a starting viewport width of 1280 CSS
> pixels wide at 400% zoom. For web pages which are designed to scroll
> horizontally, the 320px should be taken as the height rather than width.”
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 24 November 2017 00:30:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:18 UTC