Re: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with "change"

I can live with that


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Mobile:  613.806.9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:20 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

> +1 to Laura's latest version.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 3:16 PM
> > To: Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>
> > Cc: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>; White, Jason J
> > <jjwhite@ets.org>; Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>; WCAG <w3c-
> > wai-gl@w3.org>; Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> > Subject: Re: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with
> "change"
> >
> > Hi Steve and all,
> >
> > Yes. Explaining in in understanding may be simpler. I wonder if the
> following SC-
> > speak might be close to what you mean.
> >
> > "If the technologies being used allow the user agent to set text style
> properties,
> > then no loss of essential content or functionality occurs by setting all
> of the
> > following and by changing no other style property."
> >
> > It is a mouthful. According to the Readability Test Tool [7] . The it
> has an
> > average readability grade level of about 17. It should be easily
> understood by 22
> > to 23 year olds. But it may close a loophole.
> >
> > Thoughts everyone?
> >
> > Kindest Regards,
> > Laura
> >
> > [7]
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.web
> > pagefx.com%2Ftools%2Fread-
> > able%2Fcheck.php&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Cb031af3b069a44f
> > 24de608d52d2ed998%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C
> > 636464601601567995&sdata=r6capTorO9AAOnWKxw3wZ8YAd5qoyYpXfpCMID
> > 40g%2F8%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > On 11/16/17, Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com> wrote:
> > > Yep, you're of course right, Laura.  I'm not sure the best way to get
> > > this point across in SC-speak, or if we even need to make it more
> > > wordy and just crystalize it in Understanding.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 2:20 PM
> > > To: Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>
> > > Cc: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>; White, Jason J
> > > <jjwhite@ets.org>; Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>; WCAG
> > > <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> > > Subject: Re: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with
> "change"
> > >
> > > Hi Steve,
> > >
> > > Does "without setting any other style property" mean that the
> > > bookmarklet would need to remove *all* author styles that the author
> > > has already set and then test the metrics? If so, every page will pass.
> > >
> > > Or do you mean don't touch any of your styles that you have already
> > > set and then test the metrics? If so maybe,  "without *resetting* any
> > > other style property" would work?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Kindest Regards,
> > > Laura
> > >
> > > On 11/16/17, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com> wrote:
> > >>> "by setting all of the following, without setting any other style
> > >> property"
> > >>
> > >> That would work for me.. it is similar to an earlier recommendation I
> > >> had made,
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> David MacDonald
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> > >> Mobile:  613.806.9005
> > >>
> > >> LinkedIn
> > >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > >>
> > linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidmacdonald100&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.o
> > r
> > >>
> > g%7Cb031af3b069a44f24de608d52d2ed998%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd
> > 9e9b
> > >>
> > 65%7C0%7C0%7C636464601601567995&sdata=TN%2FMZUnPNskoa3Xm0wmn
> > Yt4Frq3Ob
> > >> 4QjSrsM1CO1FXE%3D&reserved=0>
> > >>
> > >> twitter.com/davidmacd
> > >>
> > >> GitHub
> > >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> > >>
> > hub.com%2FDavidMacDonald&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Cb031af
> > 3b0
> > >>
> > 69a44f24de608d52d2ed998%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7
> > C0%7C
> > >>
> > 636464601601567995&sdata=0ivcSGQ9i2xdQi2my1FQnobcX3V1uV1QcwF9BPgs
> > SVw%
> > >> 3D&reserved=0>
> > >>
> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.Can-Adapt.com&
> > >>
> > data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Cb031af3b069a44f24de608d52d2ed998
> > %7
> > >>
> > C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636464601601567995&s
> > data=
> > >> 8IfI5ueweV2IcYAJZ6EhN%2Fx0py8pAKOlqP6fX98QGmk%3D&reserved=0
> > >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > >> can-
> > adapt.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Cb031af3b069a44f24
> > >>
> > de608d52d2ed998%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C63
> > 646460
> > >>
> > 1601567995&sdata=jiwTWAzireHvq9iPeouf6I8qbDV7ZHdIFtVo2hbQ62E%3D&res
> > er
> > >> ved=0>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> > >> *            Including those with disabilities*
> > >>
> > >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy
> > >> policy
> > >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > >>
> > davidmacd.com%2Fdisclaimer.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Cb
> > 0
> > >>
> > 31af3b069a44f24de608d52d2ed998%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65
> > %7C0
> > >>
> > %7C0%7C636464601601567995&sdata=hTvxhFeEpzIN%2FOsn0zq3EV5b9M70Dr
> > WijxA
> > >> MetgK6Dc%3D&reserved=0>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:37 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> So, would "by setting all of the following, without setting any
> > >>> other style property" address the concern?
> > >>>
> > >>> > -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > From: Repsher, Stephen J [mailto:stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com]
> > >>> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 1:21 PM
> > >>> > To: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; Laura Carlson
> > >>> > <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; Andrew Kirkpatrick
> > >>> > <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> > >>> > Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; David MacDonald
> > >>> > <david@can-adapt.com>; Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> > >>> > Subject: RE: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with
> > >>> "change"
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > "Setting" seems reasonable to me. Regarding "only", do you mean
> > >>> > "setting
> > >>> all of
> > >>> > the following, without changing other text style properties"?
> > >>> > [Steve] Yes and no.  I mean without changing **any** other
> property.
> > >>> > In
> > >>> other
> > >>> > words, the user agent should be able to make those 4 changes alone
> > >>> without
> > >>> > loss, and if other changes are required (e.g. container sizing),
> > >>> > that
> > >>> defeats the
> > >>> > purpose of the SC.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > > From: Repsher, Stephen J [mailto:stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com]
> > >>> > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 11:02 AM
> > >>> > > To: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; Laura Carlson
> > >>> > > <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; Andrew Kirkpatrick
> > >>> > > <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> > >>> > > Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; David MacDonald <david@can-
> > >>> > adapt.com>;
> > >>> > > Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> > >>> > > Subject: RE: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt"
> > >>> > > with
> > >>> "change"
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Alright, how about just using "set" as the verb then...
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > "If the technologies being used allow the user agent to set text
> > >>> > > style properties, then no loss of essential content or
> > >>> > > functionality occurs by setting all of the following:"
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > That should fix that problem, but I'm inclined to say we need
> > >>> > > the word "only" in there somewhere given the discussion even
> > >>> > > amongst ourselves had to reiterate it.  I had tossed that in
> > >>> > > there a while back but not sure why it was removed and would
> > >>> > > have to check the GitHub thread.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Steve
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > > From: White, Jason J [mailto:jjwhite@ets.org]
> > >>> > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 10:44 AM
> > >>> > > To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; Andrew
> > >>> > > Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> > >>> > > Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; David MacDonald <david@can-
> > >>> > adapt.com>;
> > >>> > > Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> > >>> > > Subject: RE: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt"
> > >>> > > with
> > >>> "change"
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I remain concerned that David's proposal doesn't address
> > >>> > > Andrew's case in which no "change" is necessary, because the
> > >>> > > content already meets the four requirements listed in the SC. I
> > >>> > > suppose one could say that there's a trivial null transformation
> > >>> > > involved (i.e., no change could still be treated as a "change"),
> > >>> > > which is however counter-intuitive and a very subtle - indeed
> > >>> > > dubious - interpretation of the text.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I'm leaning toward saying, no, I can't live with David's revert.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Perhaps "ensuring all of the following" would be better, where
> > >>> "ensuring"
> > >>> > > includes either changing or leaving alone if the author has
> > >>> > > already met the specified thresholds.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > > > From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com]
> > >>> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 10:05 AM
> > >>> > > > To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> > >>> > > > Cc: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; WCAG
> > >>> > > > <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>;
> > >>> > > > Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> > >>> > > > Subject: Re: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt"
> > >>> > > > with
> > >>> "change"
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Text at the end of our November 13, 2017 meeting:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > "If the technologies being used allow the user agent to change
> > >>> > > > text style properties, the following can be achieved with no
> > >>> > > > loss of essential content or
> > >>> > > > functionality:
> > >>> > > > * the 4 things
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > David's proposed revert [5]:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > "If the technologies being used allow the user agent to change
> > >>> > > > text style properties, then no loss of essential content or
> > >>> > > > functionality occurs by changing all of the following:"
> > >>> > > > * the 4 things
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Thank you.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Kindest Regards,
> > >>> > > > Laura
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > [5]
> > >>> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F
> > >>> > > > %
> > >>> > > > 2Flis
> > >>> > > > ts
> > >>> > > > .w3.o
> > >>> > > > rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0368.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C700
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > b333d209b412a9c1a08d52d03766a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 7C0%7C0%7C636464415244080402&sdata=696nDSdTQHKxkuSw3lWGUqVOSX6
> > >>> > > > eR8l86ZDq3Vgw47Q%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > On 11/16/17, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >>> > > > > Laura,
> > >>> > > > > I’m sure that the options were clearly laid out somewhere in
> > >>> > > > > the thread, but I don’t have time to find it. Can you
> > >>> > > > > clearly lay out “before” and “proposed” options?
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > Thanks,
> > >>> > > > > AWK
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick
> > >>> > > > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com
> > >>> > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2
> > >>> > > > > F
> > >>> > > > > %2Ftw
> > >>> > > > > it
> > >>> > > > > te
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > r.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C700b333d209b412
> > >>> > > > a9c1a
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 08d52d03766a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C63646
> > >>> > > > 4415244
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 080402&sdata=kszdaxRJsWVstas19rZOJnWmR3UB7bdcevZEcLFajJg%3D&reserv
> > >>> > > > ed=0
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > On 11/16/17, 09:56, "Laura Carlson"
> > >>> > > > > <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     Hello everyone,
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     I wrote:
> > >>> > > > >     > Andrew, Jason, and everyone else, can you live with
> > >>> reverting the
> > >>> > > > >     > adapting text language by replacing "adapt" with
> "change"
> > >>> > > > > as
> > >>> David
> > >>> > > > >     > suggested? [5]
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     Please let me rephrase that.
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     After reviewing the video demonstration, draft
> > >>> > > > > technique, and
> > >>> test
> > >>> > > > >     results can anyone not live with reverting the adapting
> > >>> > > > > text
> > >>> language
> > >>> > > > >     by replacing "adapt" with "change" to what David
> suggested?
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     Thank you.
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     Best Regards,
> > >>> > > > >     Laura
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     On 11/15/17, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > > > >     > Hello Andrew, Jason, and all,
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > Andrew wrote [1]:
> > >>> > > > >     >> It would help me to understand exactly what steps you
> > >>> > > > > envision a user
> > >>> > > > >     >> would need to
> > >>> > > > >     >> follow to achieve the following four items, and
> > >>> > > > > provide an example page
> > >>> > > > >     >> that shows
> > >>> > > > >     >> this working as you envision it.
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > Alastair provided a video demonstration of what a
> > >>> > > > > person would need to
> > >>> > > > >     > do to test for the four items on the BBC and Adobe
> > >>> > > > > homepages.[2] Thank
> > >>> > > > >     > you, Alastair!
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > For that step-by-step process in text, please check
> > >>> > > > > our draft
> > >>> > > > >     > technique "Allowing for Spacing Override". [3]
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > For results of the testing that we completed using
> > >>> > > > > that
> > >>> step-by-step
> > >>> > > > >     > procedure, please check the "Results of Bookmarklet
> > >>> > > > > Tests
> > >>> for Issue
> > >>> > > > >     > 78".[4] Between July 25 and August 3, 2017, 67 pages
> > >>> > > > > were
> > >>> tested. If
> > >>> > > > >     > the spacing parameters supplied by the author already
> > >>> > > > > meets or exceeds
> > >>> > > > >     > the SC's specified metrics, the content passes the
> > >>> > > > > test
> > >>> using the
> > >>> > > > >     > bookmarklet.
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > Does the video demonstration, draft technique, and
> > >>> > > > > test
> > >>> results
> > >>> > > > >     > provide the clarity needed?
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > Andrew, Jason, and everyone else, can you live with
> > >>> reverting the
> > >>> > > > >     > adapting text language by replacing "adapt" with
> "change"
> > >>> > > > > as
> > >>> David
> > >>> > > > >     > suggested? [5]
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > Thank you.
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > Kindest Regards,
> > >>> > > > >     > Laura
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > [1]
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F
> > >>> > > > %
> > >>> > > > 2Flis
> > >>> > > > ts
> > >>> > > > .w3.o
> > >>> > > > rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0370.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 464409791358570&sdata=DIMiABzs3Pd1HEAQZI5t%2FQxTAeaXeqyT%2FCwpbB
> > >>> > > > %2FNnZE%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> > > > >     > [2]
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F
> > >>> > > > %
> > >>> > > > 2Flis
> > >>> > > > ts
> > >>> > > > .w3.o
> > >>> > > > rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0373.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 464409791358570&sdata=03fGYgLdaQfwsqHHd0EmAIZloK5iSz3E%2B3NWWLN
> > >>> > > > 3QEY%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> > > > >     > [3]
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FAllowing_for_Spacing_Override&data=02%7C01
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > %7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636464409791358570&sdata=NejhMNltxv0VwBtv1jIK
> > >>> > > > s90MuWL39OtfN21DaTPf3X8%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> > > > >     > [4]
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FResults_of_Bookmarklet_Tests_for_Issue_78&
> > >>> > d
> > >>> > a
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > ta=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636464409791358570&sdata=tc9Wjhg3
> > >>> > > > 1KL11sE1TGIKLkx7ghxQtbgnkWbqS3Clcmg%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> > > > >     > [5]
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F
> > >>> > > > %
> > >>> > > > 2Flis
> > >>> > > > ts
> > >>> > > > .w3.o
> > >>> > > > rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0368.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > 464409791358570&sdata=hNH%2BJRMlEOz9uzbU8JpGlnmg49MxnU8n19Y0JRd
> > >>> > > > Grp4%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >     > --
> > >>> > > > >     > Laura L. Carlson
> > >>> > > > >     >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >     --
> > >>> > > > >     Laura L. Carlson
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > --
> > >>> > > > Laura L. Carlson
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > ________________________________
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
> > >>> > > privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by
> > >>> > > the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed
> > >>> > > incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify
> > >>> > > the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any
> > >>> > > action in reliance on the contents of this information; and
> > >>> > > delete it from your system. Any
> > >>> other use of
> > >>> > this e-mail is prohibited.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Thank you for your compliance.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > ________________________________
> > >>> >
> > >>> > ________________________________
> > >>> >
> > >>> > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
> > >>> > privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by
> > >>> > the individual for
> > >>> whom it is
> > >>> > intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this
> > >>> > e-mail in
> > >>> error,
> > >>> > please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> > >>> > take any
> > >>> action in
> > >>> > reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from
> > >>> > your
> > >>> system. Any
> > >>> > other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thank you for your compliance.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > ________________________________
> > >>>
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>>
> > >>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged
> > >>> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual
> > >>> for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you
> > >>> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not
> > >>> disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the
> > >>> contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any
> > >>> other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you for your compliance.
> > >>>
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Laura L. Carlson
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Laura L. Carlson
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________
>

Received on Thursday, 16 November 2017 23:00:41 UTC