Re: CFC - Exit Criteria for CR

What it means is that the Working Group needs to respond to the comments that it receives during the CR period.  Pretty straightforward.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Monday, November 13, 2017 at 14:39
To: "alands289@gmail.com" <alands289@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: RE: CFC - Exit Criteria for CR

I do not remember discussing the bellow sentence at tpac. What does it mean?
"
1.   The Working Group has responded formally to all issues raised against this document related to any implementation efforts during the Candidate Recommendation period."


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fil.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Flisaseeman%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9f6d3ca38d1a4d79195c08d52ace3810%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636461987563622110&sdata=41Xt89IMFaTo0WqmXOWPZpN4cbWH2YugOCAPP%2FBkgp0%3D&reserved=0>, Twitter<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FSeemanLisa&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9f6d3ca38d1a4d79195c08d52ace3810%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636461987563622110&sdata=arfs%2FeWUo0%2FDYjWfSSq8b%2BFoZfgGxI8OYndi0l1VnsU%3D&reserved=0>



---- On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:01:21 +0200 ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com> wrote ----
+1

Alan Smith

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 12:13 AM
To: WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Exit Criteria for CR
Importance: High

Call For Consensus — ends Monday November 13th at 11:15pm Boston time.

The Working Group has discussed exit criteria for the Candidate Recommendation stage for WCAG 2.1 at TPAC (https://www.w3.org/2017/11/06-ag-minutes.html#item09)<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F11%2F06-ag-minutes.html%23item09)&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9f6d3ca38d1a4d79195c08d52ace3810%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636461987563622110&sdata=HIrto%2BsokiDwXem3jy94IwhxDQuxWFjrhhbivxUfwaA%3D&reserved=0> and there is an apparent concensus  (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_CR_Exit_Criteria<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FWCAG_2.1_CR_Exit_Criteria&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9f6d3ca38d1a4d79195c08d52ace3810%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636461987563622110&sdata=RVL24FA%2Fie541e31Y%2BHL%2F3v9CUy9QnOHOlH%2FnpaQFSU%3D&reserved=0>).

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>