Re: Additional survey for TPAC: Understanding documents for candidate SC

The survey is really to facilitate discussion at TPAC and beyond  but also capture the option of group on the status of the  current understanding documents. 
Please all, do give it your attention. 
HTH 
Josh 

InterAccess - Accessible UX
-------- Original message --------From: "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.nl> Date: 04/11/2017  13:15  (GMT+00:00) To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: Additional survey for TPAC: Understanding documents for candidate  SC 

Hi Joshua,



I see this Questionnaire is open for another 13 days.
Also the text suggests you'll need it this week for "active topic discussion at TPAC..."



At the moment only Laura commented on about half of them (Good job Laura!).
As this one is pretty comprehensive to respond to all Understanding docs I'm wondering what is expected when.



Will it be desirable to focus on these ones OR do Github issues get  priority?
As time is scarce some focus would be great!



Cheers!
Jake





From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>

Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 6:42 PM

To: WCAG

Subject: Additional survey for TPAC: Understanding documents for candidate SC
 


Hi all,



The chairs would like you to review the current 'Understanding documents' that we have for our new success criteria.

The question is straightforward. Are the SCs supported by their related understand docs, and what suggestions

and/or concerns do you have?



Please review the following survey. [1]



This will be an active topic for discussion at TPAC if not before.



Thanks



[1] 
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/understanding_SC/ 


-- 

Joshue O Connor

Director | InterAccess.ie 





-----------------------------------------------------------------
ATTENTION:
The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Saturday, 4 November 2017 14:04:10 UTC