- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:26:04 -0400
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDZ8OGMeK0Fv0-YYU15zq5ZyTz1_Wsw0AmfWZRn+HYr=3A@mail.gmail.com>
That's a good proposal. Let's do it. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to do a little testing of the testability for graphics contrast. > The SC includes a couple of new concepts and we are getting comments about > the testability. Andrew & Josh were happy for me to include this (within a > time limit anyway). > > > > This is a request for examples, but first the proposal for context. > > > > I’d like to setup a short ‘quiz’ for the people at TPAC where: > > - I run through the ‘how to test’ graphics contrast from the > understanding doc in 2-5 minutes. > - Everyone looks at 2 pages that include a variety of text & graphics, > so see if people ID the same ones that are 'required for understanding'. > - Everyone looks at a page with isolated examples of graphics (10ish > examples?) and decides whether it passes for fails, with some notes on why > they thought that. > - We compare notes, see how much agreement there is. > > Hopefully an exercise that is less than 30 mins, but gives some clarity > (and confidence) in the testability of graphics contrast. > > > > So my question (aimed especially at the sceptics!) *is what examples you > can suggest and send to me?* > > > > Please email me (*not* the list), and I’ll collate the most different & > difficult ones for TPAC. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair > > >
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2017 00:26:33 UTC