Re: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

EA,

Just to make sure you are +1 the correct this, this is for Change to SC 
2.6.2 Orientation.

See new CFC with subject - 'CFC - Change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation'

Thanks and apologies for any hassles.

Josh

EA Draffan wrote:
>
> +1 I agree easier to read
>
> Sorry a bit of a query… should it be 'Programmatic Notification'?
>
> Best wishes
>
> E.A.
>
> Mrs E.A. Draffan
>
> WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
>
> Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
>
> http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk 
> <https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=69b1RzNTDwem3wbm4pLRmuYfTLt16YjcghtEpZBsF5Sebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2faccess.ecs.soton.ac.uk%2f>
>
> UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/ 
> <https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=WUwOCw_4FszLSzcUbkoFdDkad8-Q_GrRfPYUJ_ol5l2ebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aaate.net%2f>
>
> *From:*Mike Elledge [mailto:melledge@yahoo.com]
> *Sent:* 19 October 2017 14:12
> *To:* Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Cc:* David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>; ALAN SMITH 
> <alands289@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic 
> Notification'
>
> +1  Reads better!
>
> On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:08 PM, David MacDonald 
> <david100@sympatico.ca <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
> *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
> /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
>
> /            Including those with disabilities/
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy 
> policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:23 PM, ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com 
> <mailto:alands289@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     +1
>
>     Alan Smith
>
>     *From: *Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>
>     *Sent: *Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:09 PM
>     *To: *WCAG <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>     *Subject: *CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic
>     Notification'
>
>     Call For Consensus — ends Friday October 20th at 1:00pm Boston time.
>
>     The Working Group has a proposed change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation [1]
>
>     from:
>
>     " Content is not locked to a specific display orientation, and
>     functionality of the content is operable in all display
>     orientations, except where display orientation is essential for
>     use of the content."
>
>     to
>
>     "Content is operable in all display orientations supported by the
>     user agent, except where display orientation is essential".
>
>     Original Github issue can be viewed here:
>     https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/ issues/70
>     <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/commit/b5c68e17f82feb0cdbbafc273f245b136a7445c4>
>
>
>     This was discussed on todays call: https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17-
>     ag-minutes.html#item03
>     <https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17-ag-minutes.html#item03>
>
>     If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that
>     have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns
>     result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please
>     let the group know before the CfC deadline.
>
>     [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/# orientation
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#orientation>
>
>     Thanks
>
>     -- 
>     Joshue O Connor
>     Director *| InterAccess.ie *
>

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie