Re: Discussion: Change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation

On 18/10/2017 16:36, Detlev Fischer wrote:

> In my view, the SC text should *not* refer to a mechanism if only for reason that it will give developers the idea that introducing controls for locking / unlocking on the content level might be a smart idea. KISS!

But if the outcome of having a control that locks/unlocks/sets 
orientation results in users being able to use the content, and the end 
result is accessible/solves the problem that the SC wants to address, 
then it should be a valid approach, no?

Patrick H. Lauke | |
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 15:41:44 UTC