W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2017

Re: Discussion: Change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:41:20 +0100
To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <c5e132d8-6539-b4aa-2abd-717a8c252cca@splintered.co.uk>
On 18/10/2017 16:36, Detlev Fischer wrote:

> In my view, the SC text should *not* refer to a mechanism if only for reason that it will give developers the idea that introducing controls for locking / unlocking on the content level might be a smart idea. KISS!

But if the outcome of having a control that locks/unlocks/sets 
orientation results in users being able to use the content, and the end 
result is accessible/solves the problem that the SC wants to address, 
then it should be a valid approach, no?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 15:41:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:18 UTC